ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2018
SPECT/CT image-based dosimetry for Yttrium-90 radionuclide therapy: Application to treatment response.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards personalised dosimetry in patients with liver malignancy treated withEJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Standardizing SPECT/CT dosimetry following radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres.EJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- [Chinese expert consensus on selective internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90 for primary and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2021Article
- Retrospective SPECT/CT dosimetry following transarterial radioembolization.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Theranostic Radionuclides Used in Transarterial Radioembolization for Liver Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Towards standardization of absolute SPECT/CT quantification: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study.EJNMMI physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work demonstrates the efficacy of voxel-based
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.