ArticlePhysiological reports2018
Differential electrophysiological properties of D1 and D2 spiny projection neurons in the mouse nucleus accumbens core.
Article in Physiological reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct electrophysiology and dopaminergic modulation of medium spiny neurons across divisions of the tail striatum and the dorsolateral striatum.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Article
- An anatomical substrate of credit assignment in reinforcement learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Release From a Unique Subpopulation of Accumbal Neurons Constrains Action-Outcome Acquisition in Reward Learning.Biological psychiatry · 2025Article
- Activation of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 3 Modulates Thalamo-accumbal Transmission and Rescues Schizophrenia-Like Physiological and Behavioral Deficits.Biological psychiatry · 2024Article
- Fundamental Sex Differences in Cocaine-Induced Plasticity of Dopamine D1 Receptor- and D2 Receptor-Expressing Medium Spiny Neurons in the Mouse Nucleus Accumbens Shell.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024Article
- miR-218 Promotes Dopaminergic Differentiation and Controls Neuron Excitability and Neurotransmitter Release through the Regulation of a Synaptic-Related Genes Network.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Reactive Oxygen Species Mediate Transcriptional Responses to Dopamine and Cocaine in Human Cerebral Organoids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Aging in nucleus accumbens and its impact on alcohol use disorders.Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- Resilience to anhedonia-passive coping induced by early life experience is linked to a long-lasting reduction of INeurobiology of stress · 2021Article
- Article
- Molecular Plasticity of the Nucleus Accumbens Revisited-Astrocytic Waves Shall Rise.Molecular neurobiology · 2019Review
- MMP-1 overexpression selectively alters inhibition in D1 spiny projection neurons in the mouse nucleus accumbens core.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Differential electrophysiological properties of D1 and D2 spiny projection neurons in the mouse nucleus accumbens core.Physiological reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The striatum consists of the dorsal (caudate/putamen) and the ventral (nucleus accumbens) regions. The nucleus accumbens is further divided into a core and shell. Both the dorsal and ventral striatum contain populations of spiny projection neurons, which make up 95% of the neurons within the striatum. SPNs are canonically categorized into those that express the D1-type dopamine receptor (D1 SPNs) and those that express the D2-type dopamine receptor (D2 SPNs). D1 and D2 SPNs differ with respect to both synaptic inputs and projection targets. In the dorsal striatum, it is well established that these populations of SPNs differ in terms of their electrophysiological and morphological properties. However, there remains a gap in our knowledge of the electrophysiological properties of SPNs in the nucleus accumbens core. To evaluate the differential properties of these SPNs, we performed whole-cell recordings from D1 and D2 SPNs in BAC transgenic mice in which D1 SPNs fluoresce red and D2 SPNs fluoresce green. The two SPN subtypes did not differ in terms of their time constant, capacitance, resting membrane potential, or tonic current. However, D2 SPNs displayed heightened inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) and miniature excitatory PSC frequency as compared with D1 SPNs. Furthermore, D2 SPNs displayed decreased rheobase, increased excitability as measured by firing rates to depolarizing current injections, increased inward rectification, increased input resistance, and decreased dendritic complexity compared to D1 SPNs. Our results demonstrate a dichotomy in the electrophysiological properties of D1 and D2 SPNs in the nucleus accumbens core, which contributes to our knowledge of ventral striatal circuitry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.