Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29962016›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2018

Differential electrophysiological properties of D1 and D2 spiny projection neurons in the mouse nucleus accumbens core.

Nour Al-Muhtasib, Patrick A Forcelli, Stefano Vicini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An anatomical substrate of credit assignment in reinforcement learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nour Al-MuhtasibDepartment of Pharmacology & Physiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0002-6985-1925
Patrick A ForcelliDepartment of Pharmacology & Physiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0003-1763-060X
Stefano ViciniDepartment of Pharmacology & Physiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0001-8671-5194
Georgetown University · US

Funding

NINDS NIH HHS L40 NS103805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The striatum consists of the dorsal (caudate/putamen) and the ventral (nucleus accumbens) regions. The nucleus accumbens is further divided into a core and shell. Both the dorsal and ventral striatum contain populations of spiny projection neurons, which make up 95% of the neurons within the striatum. SPNs are canonically categorized into those that express the D1-type dopamine receptor (D1 SPNs) and those that express the D2-type dopamine receptor (D2 SPNs). D1 and D2 SPNs differ with respect to both synaptic inputs and projection targets. In the dorsal striatum, it is well established that these populations of SPNs differ in terms of their electrophysiological and morphological properties. However, there remains a gap in our knowledge of the electrophysiological properties of SPNs in the nucleus accumbens core. To evaluate the differential properties of these SPNs, we performed whole-cell recordings from D1 and D2 SPNs in BAC transgenic mice in which D1 SPNs fluoresce red and D2 SPNs fluoresce green. The two SPN subtypes did not differ in terms of their time constant, capacitance, resting membrane potential, or tonic current. However, D2 SPNs displayed heightened inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) and miniature excitatory PSC frequency as compared with D1 SPNs. Furthermore, D2 SPNs displayed decreased rheobase, increased excitability as measured by firing rates to depolarizing current injections, increased inward rectification, increased input resistance, and decreased dendritic complexity compared to D1 SPNs. Our results demonstrate a dichotomy in the electrophysiological properties of D1 and D2 SPNs in the nucleus accumbens core, which contributes to our knowledge of ventral striatal circuitry.

Indexed as

Synaptic PotentialsAnimalsDopaminergic NeuronsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNucleus AccumbensReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2Nucleus accumbensventral striatum

Identifiers

PMID29962016
PMCPMC6026590
OpenAlexW2810758302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.