Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29961852›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2018

Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression.

Jack Bowden, Wesley Spiller, Fabiola Del Greco M, Nuala Sheehan, John Thompson, Cosetta Minelli, George Davey Smith

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 462 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
462citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
25.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

462 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 905 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Multi-Ancestry Mendelian Randomization Reveals Lipid-Associated Genetic Risk Factors for COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

402 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jack BowdenMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Wesley SpillerMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Fabiola Del Greco MInstitute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Nuala SheehanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
John ThompsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Cosetta MinelliPopulation Health and Occupational Disease, NHLI, Imperial College, London, UK.
George Davey SmithMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBEurac Research · ITImperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/1Medical Research Council MCUU00011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/2Medical Research Council MCUU00011/2Medical Research Council MR/N501906/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: data furnishing a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study are often visualized with the aid of a scatter plot, in which single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-outcome associations are plotted against the SNP-exposure associations to provide an immediate picture of the causal-effect estimate for each individual variant. It is also convenient to overlay the standard inverse-variance weighted (IVW) estimate of causal effect as a fitted slope, to see whether an individual SNP provides evidence that supports, or conflicts with, the overall consensus. Unfortunately, the traditional scatter plot is not the most appropriate means to achieve this aim whenever SNP-outcome associations are estimated with varying degrees of precision and this is reflected in the analysis. Methods: We propose instead to use a small modification of the scatter plot-the Galbraith Radial plot-for the presentation of data and results from an MR study, which enjoys many advantages over the original method. On a practical level, it removes the need to recode the genetic data and enables a more straightforward detection of outliers and influential data points. Its use extends beyond the purely aesthetic, however, to suggest a more general modelling framework to operate within when conducting an MR study, including a new form of MR-Egger regression. Results: We illustrate the methods using data from a two-sample MR study to probe the causal effect of systolic blood pressure on coronary heart disease risk, allowing for the possible effects of pleiotropy. The Radial plot is shown to aid the detection of a single outlying variant that is responsible for large differences between IVW and MR-Egger regression estimates. Several additional plots are also proposed for informative data visualization. Conclusions: The Radial plot should be considered in place of the scatter plot for visualizing, analysing and interpreting data from a two-sample summary data MR study. Software is provided to help facilitate its use.

Indexed as

Data VisualizationGenetic PleiotropyGenetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic VariationHumansMendelian Randomization Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29961852
PMCPMC6124632
OpenAlexW2761141539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.