Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29961834›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Assessment of Human-to-Human Transmissibility of Avian Influenza A(H7N9) Virus Across 5 Waves by Analyzing Clusters of Case Patients in Mainland China, 2013-2017.

Xiling Wang, Peng Wu, Yao Pei, Tim K Tsang, Dantong Gu, Wei Wang, Juanjuan Zhang, Peter W Horby, Timothy M Uyeki, Benjamin J Cowling and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Preparedness, prevention and control related to zoonotic avian influenza.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. H7N9 Influenza Virus in China.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Coronavirus and other airborne agents with pandemic potential.Current opinion in environmental science & health · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Xiling WangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai.
Peng WuWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Yao PeiSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai.
Tim K TsangDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Dantong GuSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai.
Wei WangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai.
Juanjuan ZhangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai.
Peter W HorbyCenter for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Timothy M UyekiInfluenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Benjamin J CowlingWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Hongjie YuSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai.
Fudan University · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HKCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Understanding and controlling antibiotic resistanceU54GM088558 · NIGMS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI BUCKEE, CAROLINE O'FLAHERTY · 2009 to 2018
$26.4M
Virology &ImmunologyU19AI051915 · NIAID · NATIONAL CENTER FOR AIDS/STD CONTROL AND PREVENTION · PI GAO, GEORGE FU · 2002 to 2009
$21.6M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI051915NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM088558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The 2016-17 epidemic of human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus was alarming, due to the surge in reported cases across a wide geographic area and the emergence of highly-pathogenic A(H7N9) viruses. Our study aimed to assess whether the human-to-human transmission risk of A(H7N9) virus has changed across the 5 waves since 2013. Methods: Data on human cases and clusters of A(H7N9) virus infection were collected from the World Health Organization, open access national and provincial reports, informal online sources, and published literature. We compared the epidemiological characteristics of sporadic and cluster cases, estimated the relative risk (RR) of infection in blood relatives and non-blood relatives, and estimated the bounds on the effective reproductive number (Re) across waves from 2013 through September 2017. Results: We identified 40 human clusters of A(H7N9) virus infection, with a median cluster size of 2 (range 2-3). The overall RR of infection in blood relatives versus non-blood relatives was 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88, 3.09), and was not significantly different across waves (χ2 = 2.66, P = .617). The upper limit of Re for A(H7N9) virus was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.10, 0.14) and was not significantly different across waves (χ2 = 1.52, P = .822). Conclusions: The small cluster size and low Re suggest that human-to-human transmissibility of A(H7N9) virus has not changed over time and remains limited to date. Continuous assessment of A(H7N9) virus infections and human case clusters is of crucial importance for public health.

Indexed as

Basic Reproduction NumberDisease Transmission, InfectiousAdultAnimalsChinaCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansInfluenza A Virus, H7N9 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID29961834
PMCPMC6355824
OpenAlexW2810695063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.