Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29961746›Full record

ArticleAnnals of rehabilitation medicine2018

Optimal Placement of Needle Electromyography in Extensor Indicis: A Cadaveric Study.

Jin Young Im, Hong Bum Park, Seok Jun Lee, Seong Gyu Lim, Ki Hoon Kim, Dasom Kim, Im Joo Rhyu, Byung Kyu Park, Dong Hwee Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin Young ImDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0666-4580
Hong Bum ParkDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7642-4510
Seok Jun LeeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4495-2209
Seong Gyu LimDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3681-6429
Ki Hoon KimDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7257-3858
Dasom KimDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7817-3652
Im Joo RhyuDepartment of Anatomy, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5558-6278
Byung Kyu ParkDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8445-7099
Dong Hwee KimDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8116-0078
Korea University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the center of extensor indicis (EI) muscle through cadaver dissection and compare the accuracy of different techniques for needle electromyography (EMG) electrode insertion.

methodsEighteen upper limbs of 10 adult cadavers were dissected. The center of trigonal EI muscle was defined as the point where the three medians of the triangle intersect. Three different needle electrode insertion techniques were introduced: M1, 2.5 cm above the lower border of ulnar styloid process (USP), lateral aspect of the ulna; M2, 2 finger breadths (FB) proximal to USP, lateral aspect of the ulna; and M3, distal fourth of the forearm, lateral aspect of the ulna. The distance from USP to the center (X) parallel to the line between radial head to USP, and from medial border of ulna to the center (Y) were measured. The distances between 3 different points (M1- M3) and the center were measured (marked as D1, D2, and D3, respectively).

resultsThe median value of X was 48.3 mm and that of Y was 7.2 mm. The median values of D1, D2 and D3 were 23.3 mm, 13.3 mm and 9.0 mm, respectively.

conclusionThe center of EI muscle is located approximately 4.8 cm proximal to USP level and 7.2 mm lateral to the medial border of the ulna. Among the three methods, the technique placing the needle electrode at distal fourth of the forearm and lateral to the radial side of the ulna bone (M3) is the most accurate and closest to the center of the EI muscle.

Indexed as

CadaverElectrodiagnosisElectromyographyExtensor indicisNeedles

Identifiers

PMID29961746
PMCPMC6058587
OpenAlexW2810826470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.