Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29961588›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2018

An in vitro evaluation of turbulence after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Hoda Hatoum, Atieh Yousefi, Scott Lilly, Pablo Maureira, Juan Crestanello, Lakshmi P Dasi

Abstract readComparative StudyVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Biomechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hoda HatoumDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Atieh YousefiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Scott LillyDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Pablo MaureiraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Juan CrestanelloDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Lakshmi P DasiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: lakshmi.dasi@osumc.edu.

Funding

Superhydrophobic Heart Valve ProsthesisR01HL135505 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DASI, LAKSHMI PRASAD, KOTA, ARUN KUMAR · 2017 to 2020
$2.9M
Hyaluronan enhanced polymeric heart valve prosthesisR01HL119824 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DASI, LAKSHMI PRASAD · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119824NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed at assessment of post-transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) replacement hemodynamics and turbulence when a same-size SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, Calif) and Medtronic Evolut (Minneapolis, Minn) were implanted in a rigid aortic root with physiological dimensions and in a representative root with calcific leaflets obtained from patient computed tomography scans.

methodsTAV hemodynamics were studied by placing a SAPIEN 3 26-mm and an Evolut 26-mm in rigid aortic roots and representative root with calcific leaflets under physiological conditions. Hemodynamics were assessed using high-fidelity particle image velocimetry and high-speed imaging. Transvalvular pressure gradients (PGs), pinwheeling indices, and Reynolds shear stress (RSS) were calculated.

results(1) PGs obtained with the Evolut and the SAPIEN 3 were comparable among the different models (10.5 ± 0.15 mm Hg vs 7.76 ± 0.083 mm Hg in the rigid model along with 13.9 ± 0.19 mm Hg vs 5.0 ± 0.09 mm Hg in representative root with calcific leaflets obtained from patient computed tomography scans respectively); (2) more pinwheeling was found in the SAPIEN 3 than the Evolut (0.231 ± 0.057 vs 0.201 ± 0.05 in the representative root with calcific leaflets and 0.366 ± 0.067 vs 0.122 ± 0.045 in the rigid model); (3) higher rates of RSS were found in the Evolut (161.27 ± 3.45 vs 122.84 ± 1.76 Pa in representative root with calcific leaflets and 337.22 ± 7.05 vs 157.91 ± 1.80 Pa in rigid models). More lateral fluctuations were found in representative root with calcific leaflets.

conclusions(1) Comparable PGs were found among the TAVs in different models; (2) pinwheeling indices were found to be different between both TAVs; (3) turbulence patterns among both TAVs translated according to RSS were different. Rigid aortic models yield more conservative estimates of turbulence; (4) both TAVs exhibit peak maximal RSS that exceeds platelet activation 100 Pa threshold limit.

Indexed as

Heart Valve ProsthesisHemodynamicsAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisBiomechanical PhenomenaBlood Flow VelocityCalcinosisHumansModels, CardiovascularPatient-Specific ModelingPlatelet ActivationProsthesis DesignRisk FactorsStress, MechanicalThrombosisTime Factorshemodynamicsplatelet activationtranscatheter aortic valveturbulence

Identifiers

PMID29961588
PMCPMC6196367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.