Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29961210›Full record

ReviewMolecular and cellular biochemistry2019

Is there any evidence that AGE/sRAGE is a universal biomarker/risk marker for diseases?

Kailash Prasad

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Role of P53 in Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kailash PrasadDepartment of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada. k.prasad@usask.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5935-7774
University of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced glycation end products (AGE) and its cell-bound receptor called receptor for AGE (RAGE) are implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous diseases. Soluble receptor for AGE (sRAGE) counteracts the adverse effects of AGE-RAGE interaction by competing with RAGE for binding with AGE. Low levels of serum sRAGE have been proposed as a biomarker for diseases. However, the serum levels of sRAGE in diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are elevated. Thus, low levels of sRAGE cannot be a universal biomarker. An elevated ratio of AGE/sRAGE was then proposed as a universal biomarker. However, evidence was not provided for this new biomarker. The objective of this paper is to provide evidence in support of elevated AGE/sRAGE being a universal biomarker. The data for serum levels of AGE, sRAGE, and ratio of AGE/sRAGE were collected from patients with low serum sRAGE [non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), hyperthyroidism (HT), thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA),and hypercholesterolemia (HC)], and with high serum levels of sRAGE [type-2 diabetes (T2D) and ESRD], and control subjects. The serum levels of AGE and ratio of AGE/sRAGE were higher in all types of patients irrespective of low or high serum sRAGE as compared to control subjects. Reasons are provided as to why AGE or sRAGE individually cannot be considered as a universal biomarker. In conclusion, the evidence supports the validity of the high ratio AGE/sRAGE as a universal biomarker/risk marker for diseases.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycation End Products, AdvancedHumansKidney Failure, ChronicPrognosisReceptor for Advanced Glycation End ProductsThyroid DiseasesBiomarkersGlycation End Products, AdvancedReceptor for Advanced Glycation End ProductsAdvanced glycation end products (AGEs)AGE/sRAGE an universal biomarker for diseaseDiseases with low and high sRAGEReceptor for AGE (RAGE)Soluble receptor for AGE (sRAGE)

Identifiers

PMID29961210
OpenAlexW2811435100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.