Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29961209›Full record

SynthesisInfection2018

Dual antiretroviral therapy with tenofovir (TDF) and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/RTV) in an HIV-1 positive patient: a case report, review, and meta-analysis of the literature on dual treatment strategies using protease inhibitors in combination with an NRTI.

S Höring, B Löffler, M W Pletz, S Rößler, S Weis, B T Schleenvoigt

Abstract readCase ReportsMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S HöringInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. steffen.hoering@med.uni-jena.de.
B LöfflerInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
M W PletzInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
S RößlerInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
S WeisInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
B T SchleenvoigtInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

BMBF 01KI1501BMBF 03ZZ0820D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHere, we report the case of an HIV positive patient under a dual antiretroviral drug regimen with tenofovir disoproxil and darunavir/ritonavir with stable clinical, virological, and immunological response over 126 weeks. Dual antiretroviral therapy has the advantage of reduced toxicity and lower health care costs, treatment failure and fostering drug resistance are perceived risks. Optimal drug combinations and indication criteria for dual treatment remain controversial. Nevertheless, first clinical trials indicate non-inferiority for combinations of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. This case presents the combination of tenofovir disoproxil in combination with a protease inhibitor as a new potential dual treatment regimen.

methodWe performed a systematic literature search and meta-analysis of trials comparing dual to triple ART.

resultsLiterature review revealed nine studies in which dual therapy with a protease inhibitor and an NRTI was compared to triple therapy. We performed a meta-analysis of six trials that reported a 48-week follow-up. In treatment-naïve patients as well when ART switch was assessed, there was no difference in the treatment success in patients with dual ART versus triple.

conclusionWe conclude that dual therapy with a protease inhibitor and NRTI is safe and effective. The use of tenofovir in dual treatment as described in our case needs to be assessed in future clinical trials.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCD4 Lymphocyte CountDarunavirHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsRitonavirTenofovirTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeViral LoadDarunavirHIV Protease InhibitorsReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsRitonavirTenofovirAntiretroviral therapyDual therapyHIVLamivudineProtease inhibitorTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID29961209
OpenAlexW2810857573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.