Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29961173›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2018

Magnetic resonance-based pelvimetry and tumor volumetry can predict surgical difficulty and oncologic outcome in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer.

Gulsen Atasoy, Naciye Cigdem Arslan, Funda Dinc Elibol, Ozgul Sagol, Funda Obuz, Selman Sokmen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gulsen AtasoyDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Dokuz Eylul University Medical Faculty, 35340, Izmir, Turkey.
Naciye Cigdem ArslanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Istanbul Medipol University Medical Faculty, 34320, Istanbul, Turkey. cigdemarslan@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2282-7207
Funda Dinc ElibolDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University Medical Faculty, 35340, Izmir, Turkey.
Ozgul SagolDepartment of Pathology, Dokuz Eylul University Medical Faculty, 35340, Izmir, Turkey.
Funda ObuzDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University Medical Faculty, 35340, Izmir, Turkey.
Selman SokmenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Dokuz Eylul University Medical Faculty, 35340, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the impact of the pelvic dimensions and tumor volume on surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer.

methodsPatients who underwent open surgery after neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation for primary rectal cancer were included. The predictive value of magnetic resonance-based pelvic measurements and tumor volume on the surgical difficulty and oncologic outcome were analyzed.

results125 patients were included. The independent risk factors related to the circumferential resection margin status were the pT stage [odds ratio (OR) 3.64, confidence interval (CI) 1.409-7.327] and tumor volume after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (OR 1.59, CI 1.018-2.767). The operative time (p = 0.014, OR 1.453) and pelvic depth (p = 0.023, OR 1.116) were independent predictive factors for anastomotic leak. The median follow-up was 72 (2-113) months. Local recurrence was seen in 17 (14.1%) patients. Anastomotic leak (OR 1.799, CI 0.978-3.277), the circumferential resection margin status (OR 3.217, CI 1.262-7.870) and the relative tumor volume rate (OR 1.260, CI 1.004-1.912) were independent prognosticators of local recurrence. The 5-year overall survival was 66.7%. The circumferential resection margin status (hazard ratio: 4.739, CI 2.276-9.317), pN stage (OR 3.267, CI 1.195-8.930) and relative tumor volume rate (OR 2.628, CI 1.042-6.631) were independent prognostic factors for the overall survival.

conclusionsRelative dimensions of the tumor in the pelvis influence the local recurrence and overall survival rates. Magnetic resonance-based measurements can predict the difficulty of surgery and allow surgeons to consider the appropriate surgical approach.

Indexed as

AgedChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingOperative TimePelvimetryPelvisLocal recurrenceMagnetic resonancePelvimetryRectal cancerSurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.