Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29961153›Full record

ArticleBehavior genetics2018

Revisiting the Children-of-Twins Design: Improving Existing Models for the Exploration of Intergenerational Associations.

Tom A McAdams, Laurie J Hannigan, Espen Moen Eilertsen, Line C Gjerde, Eivind Ystrom, Fruhling V Rijsdijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parental income and psychiatric disorders from age 10 to 40: a genetically informative population study.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tom A McAdamsSocial, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, De Crespigny Park, Box PO80, SE5 8AF, London, UK. tom.mcadams@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6825-3499
Laurie J HanniganSocial, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, De Crespigny Park, Box PO80, SE5 8AF, London, UK.
Espen Moen EilertsenDepartment of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Line C GjerdeDepartment of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Eivind YstromDepartment of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Fruhling V RijsdijkSocial, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, De Crespigny Park, Box PO80, SE5 8AF, London, UK.

Funding

Gene-Environment Interactions in an Autism Birth CohortU01NS047537 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LIPKIN, W. IAN · 2003 to 2013
$27.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS N01 ES075558NIH HHS 1 UO1 NS 047537-01NIH HHS 2 UO1 NS 047537-06A1NIH HHS N01-ES-75558NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS047537Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 107706/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Datasets comprising twins and their children can be a useful tool for understanding the nature of intergenerational associations between parent and offspring phenotypes. In the present article we explore structural equation models previously used to analyse Children-of-Twins data, highlighting some limitations and considerations. We then present new variants of these models, showing that extending the models to include multiple offspring per parent addresses several of the limitations discussed. Accompanying the updated models, we provide power calculations and demonstrate with application to simulated data. We then apply to intergenerational analyses of height and weight, using a sub-study of the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort (MoBa); the Intergenerational Transmission of Risk (IToR) project, wherein all kinships in the MoBa data have been identified (a children-of-twins-and-siblings study). Finally, we consider how to interpret the findings of these models and discuss future directions.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsModels, BiologicalTwinsChildComputer SimulationHumansParentsPhenotypeChildren-of-twinsExtended family designIntergenerational transmissionOffspringParentThe Intergenerational Transmission of Risk (IToR) projectThe Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa)

Identifiers

PMID29961153
PMCPMC6097723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.