Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29961085›Full record

SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2018

Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes.

Anshit Goyal, Victor M Lu, Yagiz U Yolcu, Mohamed Elminawy, David J Daniels

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Postoperative raised ICP after minimally invasive surgery for monosutural craniosynostosis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Efficacy and safety of sagittal synostosis surgery in older (> 12 months) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Advantages of the double-incision approach in endoscopic management of unicoronal synostosis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  7. Spring-mediated cranioplasty for scaphocephaly: techniques and outcomes.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. What is the ideal age for surgery in single-suture craniosynostosis?Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  10. Long-term outcome in 415 operated cases with single suture scaphocephaly.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anshit GoyalMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2379-3598
Victor M LuMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yagiz U YolcuMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mohamed ElminawyMayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
David J DanielsDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA. Daniels.David@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgery for craniosynostosis remains a crucial element in successful management. Intervention by both endoscopic and open approaches has been proven effective. Given the differences in timing and indications for these procedures, differences in perioperative outcomes have yet to be thoroughly compared between the two approaches. The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the available evidence of perioperative outcomes between the two approaches in order to better influence the management paradigm of craniosynostosis.

methodsWe followed recommended PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Seven electronic databases were searched to identify all potentially relevant studies published from inception to February 2018 which were then screened against a set of selection criteria. Data were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis of proportions.

resultsTwelve studies satisfied all the selection criteria to be included, which described a pooled cohort involving 2064 craniosynostosis patients, with 965 (47%) and 1099 (53%) patients undergoing surgery by endoscopic and open approaches respectively. When compared to the open approach, it was found that the endoscopic approach conferred statistically significant reductions in blood loss (MD = 162.4 mL), operative time (MD = 112.38 min), length of stay (MD = 2.56 days), and rates of perioperative complications (OR = 0.58), reoperation (OR = 0.37) and transfusion (OR = 0.09), where all p < 0.001.

conclusionBoth endoscopic and open approaches for the surgical management of craniosynostosis are viable considerations. The endoscopic approach confers a significant reduction in operative and postoperative morbidity when compared to the open approach. Given that specific indications for either approach should be considered when managing a patient, the difference in perioperative outcomes remain an important element of this paradigm. Future studies will validate the findings of this study and consider long-term outcomes, which will all contribute to rigor of craniosynostosis management.

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesCraniotomyHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeuroendoscopyObservational Studies as TopicPlastic Surgery ProceduresProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeComplicationsCraniosynostosisEndoscopicMetopicMicroscopicMinimally invasiveOpenSagittal

Identifiers

PMID29961085
OpenAlexW2810060657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.