Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29960590›Full record

SynthesisBMC family practice2018

Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: a systematic review.

Muna Habib Al Lawati, Sarah Dennis, Stephanie D Short, Nadia Noor Abdulhadi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
42.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 258 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A meta-review of methods of measuring and monitoring safety in primary care.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Muna Habib Al LawatiFaculty of Health Sciences, Discipline of Behavioral and Social Sciences in Health, The University of Sydney, Science Road, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. drmunali@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1693-1929
Sarah DennisIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Campbell Street, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
Stephanie D ShortFaculty of Health Sciences, Discipline of Behavioral and Social Sciences in Health, The University of Sydney, Science Road, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Nadia Noor AbdulhadiDirectorate General of Planning and Studies, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman.
The University of Sydney · AUMinistry of Health · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient safety in primary care is an emerging field of research with a growing evidence base in western countries but little has been explored in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries (GCC) including the Sultanate of Oman. This study aimed to review the literature on the safety culture and patient safety measures used globally to inform the development of safety culture among health care workers in primary care with a particular focus on the Middle East.

methodsA systematic review of the literature. Searches were undertaken using Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus from the year 2000 to 2014. Terms defining safety culture were combined with terms identifying patient safety and primary care.

resultsThe database searches identified 3072 papers that were screened for inclusion in the review. After the screening and verification, data were extracted from 28 papers that described safety culture in primary care. The global distribution of the articles is as follows: the Netherlands (7), the United States (5), Germany (4), the United Kingdom (1), Australia, Canada and Brazil (two for each country), and with one each from Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. The characteristics of the included studies were grouped under the following themes: safety culture in primary care, incident reporting, safety climate and adverse events. The most common theme from 2011 onwards was the assessment of safety culture in primary care (13 studies, 46%). The most commonly used safety culture assessment tool is the Hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPSC) which has been used in developing countries in the Middle East.

conclusionsThis systematic review reveals that the most important first step is the assessment of safety culture in primary care which will provide a basic understanding to safety-related perceptions of health care providers. The HSOPSC has been commonly used in Kuwait, Turkey, and Iran.

Indexed as

Patient SafetySafety ManagementHumansMiddle EastOrganizational CulturePrimary Health CareGulf countriesOmanPatent safetyPrimary careSafety culture

Identifiers

PMID29960590
PMCPMC6026504
OpenAlexW2809789651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.