ArticleBMC family practice2018
Colorectal cancer and screening awareness and sources of information in the Hungarian population.
Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Investigating Cancer literacy and help-seeking barriers among individuals with intellectual disabilities in Hungary.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- The access to colorectal cancer screening in Thai average-risk population: a situational study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Recent trends in self-reported utilization of colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test in Europe: analysis of the European Health Interview Surveys 2013-2015 and 2018-2020.European journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Assessing awareness of colorectal cancer symptoms, risk factors and screening barriers among eligible adults in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in Egypt: a nationwide cross-sectional study.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Barriers and recommendations for colorectal cancer screening in Africa.Global health action · 2023Review
- A Review of Community Awareness for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Prevention in North and Central Asian Countries.Cureus · 2023Review
- Colorectal Cancer-The Worst Enemy Is the One We Do Not Know.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Knowledge and awareness about colorectal cancer and barriers to its screening among a sample of general public in Saudi Arabia.PloS one · 2023Article
- Experience and Attitude of Colorectal Screening Pilot Program Participants Regarding Screening and Screening Programs in Hungary.Iranian journal of public health · 2022Article
- Improving Colon Cancer Prevention in Poland. A Long Way Off.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Article
- Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors in Palestine: Where Do We Stand?JCO global oncology · 2022Article
- Knowledge and awareness of colorectal cancer risk factors, screening, and associated factors in advanced colorectal cancer patients: a multicenter cross-sectional study in China.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Knowledge, adherence and perceptions about colorectal cancer screening in primary and secondary school teachers in CarcarañáRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2021Article
- Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality trends by sex and population group in South Africa: 2002-2014.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Environmental factors and awareness of colorectal cancer in people at familial risk.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2019Article
- Exploratory Analysis of VEGF Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk in a Hungarian Population: A Case-Control Study.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to survey the level of awareness of colorectal cancer and screening and to identify sources of information among the population under investigation.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 1150 adults between the ages of 40 and 70 using quota sampling. Data were collected through self-made questionnaires to be completed by respondents.
results32.7% of the participants correctly identified the recommended beginning of colorectal cancer screening, these participants were more likely to see their physician more frequently in the past years than those answering to the qusetion incorrectly (p = 0.008). 22.4% of the respondents were in possession of appropriate information on the frequency of colorectal cancer screening and had a relatively high level of educational attainment (p < 0.001). Very few respondents were well-informed about the risk factors and symptoms of colorectal cancer. Those who were well-informed were likely to live in a county town (p < 0.001) and to have a relatively high level of educational attainment (p < 0.001). They were most likely to have accessed their information on the internet. 27.0% of respondents had not heard of CRC screening methods before. They were likely to be male and relatively young and to have a relatively low level of educational attainment. Furthermore, they saw their doctor relatively seldom. The respondents who had heard about screening methods were most likely to have gathered their information from health workers.
conclusionsThe majority of respondents did not have sufficient information about colorectal cancer and screening. This is particularly true of less educated, younger male participants who do not live in a county town and of respondents who see their physician relatively seldom. Sources of information should be used more effectively, thus yielding an increased level of awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.