Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29959952›Full record

ArticleAppetite2018

Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand.

Alexandra M Mellis, Liqa N Athamneh, Jeffrey S Stein, Yan Yan Sze, Leonard H Epstein, Warren K Bickel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Delay discounting of different outcomes: Review and theory.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Present-Focused Behavior as a Rational Adaptation to Precarity.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra M MellisCenter for Transformative Research on Health Behavior, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, United States; Graduate Program of Translational Biology, Medicine & Health, Virginia Tech, United States.
Liqa N AthamnehCenter for Transformative Research on Health Behavior, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, United States; Graduate Program of Translational Biology, Medicine & Health, Virginia Tech, United States.
Jeffrey S SteinCenter for Transformative Research on Health Behavior, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, United States.
Yan Yan SzeDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, United States.
Leonard H EpsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, United States.
Warren K BickelCenter for Transformative Research on Health Behavior, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, United States; Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, United States; Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, United States. Electronic address: wkbickel@vtc.vt.edu.
Carilion Clinic · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Delay discounting as a target for self-regulation in prediabetesUH2DK109543 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2015 to 2017
$2.4M
Delay discounting as a target for self-regulation in prediabetesUH3DK109543 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2018 to 2019
$2.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS UH2 DK109543NIDDK NIH HHS UH3 DK109543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock on monetary and fast food discounting using a cross-commodity delay discounting task and on purchasing of fast food and an alternative commodity. An obese sample (n = 120) was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and assigned to read one of two narratives: negative income shock (n = 60) or control (n = 60). Participants then completed both within- and cross-commodity discounting tasks of money and food, and purchase tasks for fast food and bottled water. The negative income shock group demonstrated greater impulsive choice across discounting tasks, as well as higher intensity of demand for fast food but not for a non-caloric control commodity (bottled water). These results suggest that negative income shock increases preference for immediate reinforcement regardless of commodity type (money or fast food), but has specific effects increasing demand for particular commodities (fast food but not an alternative). In a reinforcer pathology framework, negative income shock increasing discounting of the future while increasing demand for fast food specifically represents a high-risk state for negative health behavior in obesity.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDelay DiscountingFast FoodsImpulsive BehaviorIncomeAdultFemaleHumansMaleObesityStress, PsychologicalCross-commodityDelay discountingDemandFast foodNegative income shockObesity

Identifiers

PMID29959952
PMCPMC6156798
OpenAlexW2810159839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.