Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29959846›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

Computed Tomographic Studies of Noncalcified Nodules Related to Neuroendocrine Lung Tumor Using 68Gallium-Tagged Somatostatin Variant for Improvement in Diagnosis: A Non-Experimental, Non-Randomized, Cross-Sectional Study.

Ketian Li, Mingge Shen, Hang Geng, Linyi Zheng, Yujie Cao

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ketian LiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jamusi, Heilongjiang, China (mainland).
Mingge ShenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jamusi, Heilongjiang, China (mainland).
Hang GengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jamusi, Heilongjiang, China (mainland).
Linyi ZhengDepartment of Cardiology No. 1, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jamusi, Heilongjiang, China (mainland).
Yujie CaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jamusi, Heilongjiang, China (mainland).
First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND 18Fluoro-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)- based positron-emission computed tomography (PET) has less specificity for noncalcified nodules (NNs). Somatostatin receptors affect the expression of normal and malignant cells. The purpose of the study was to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 68Gallium-tagged DOTA-octreotate (Ga-tDO) with that of FDG PET for diagnosis of newly detected and/or untreated NNs in lung cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 45 patients with lung cancer were included in the cross-sectional study and underwent Ga-tDO and FDG PET. We further confirmed observed outcomes by testing immune histochemical staining for subtype 2A of somatostatin receptor in a granuloma tissue array. The chi-square test was performed for sensitivity and specificity of predictive values among the 3 diagnostic modalities. McNemar's test was performed to compare accuracy between Ga-tDO and FDG PET. Results were considered significant at 95% confidence level. RESULTS Ga-tDO had less sensitivity (69% vs. 89%) but more specificity (91% vs. 78%) than FDG PET. Ga-tDO and FDG PET were characterized as 36 and 6 and in 36 and 3 lesions as accurate and inaccurate, respectively. There was an insignificant difference between Ga-tDO and FDG PET regarding diagnostic accuracy (p=0.7). Dosimetry results showed that the lungs were one of the least critically affected organs. CONCLUSIONS Ga-tDO was more specific but less sensitive than FDG PET scanning and imaging.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overContrast MediaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18GalliumHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingOrganometallic CompoundsPositron-Emission Tomography1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane- 1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acidContrast MediaFluorodeoxyglucose F18GalliumHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingOrganometallic CompoundsReceptors, SomatostatinSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID29959846
PMCPMC6055512
OpenAlexW2810865883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.