Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29959758›Full record

ArticleCNS drugs2018

Antidepressants and Hepatotoxicity: A Cohort Study among 5 Million Individuals Registered in the French National Health Insurance Database.

Sophie Billioti de Gage, Cédric Collin, Thien Le-Tri, Antoine Pariente, Bernard Bégaud, Hélène Verdoux, Rosemary Dray-Spira, Mahmoud Zureik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS drugs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Acute Hepatitis Due to Agomelatine Use in Elderly Women with Depression: Case Series.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie Billioti de GageDepartment of Epidemiology of Health Products, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM), 143-147 Blvd Anatole France, 93285, Saint-Denis, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4097-8495
Cédric CollinDepartment of Epidemiology of Health Products, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM), 143-147 Blvd Anatole France, 93285, Saint-Denis, France.
Thien Le-TriDepartment of Epidemiology of Health Products, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM), 143-147 Blvd Anatole France, 93285, Saint-Denis, France.
Antoine ParienteUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Bernard BégaudUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Hélène VerdouxUniversity of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Rosemary Dray-SpiraDepartment of Epidemiology of Health Products, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM), 143-147 Blvd Anatole France, 93285, Saint-Denis, France.
Mahmoud ZureikDepartment of Epidemiology of Health Products, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM), 143-147 Blvd Anatole France, 93285, Saint-Denis, France. mahmoud.zureik@ansm.sante.fr.
Université de Bordeaux · FRAgence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatotoxicity may be a concern when prescribing antidepressants. Nevertheless, this risk remains poorly understood for serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs: venlafaxine, milnacipran, duloxetine) and 'other antidepressants' (mianserin, mirtazapine, tianeptine and agomelatine), particularly in comparison with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs: fluoxetine, citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, escitalopram), which are by far the most commonly prescribed antidepressants.

objectiveWe quantified the risk of serious liver injury associated with new use of SNRIs and 'other antidepressants' compared with SSRIs in real-life practice.

methodsBased on the French national health insurance database, this cohort study included 4,966,825 individuals aged 25 years and older with a first reimbursement of SSRIs, SNRIs or 'other antidepressants' between January 2010 and June 2015. We compared the risk of serious liver injury within the 6 months following antidepressant initiation according to antidepressant class, with SSRIs as the reference, using an inverse probability-of-treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for demographic characteristics and risk factors of liver injury.

resultsWe identified 382 serious liver injuries overall (none for milnacipran initiators). Age and gender standardized incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were 19.2 for SSRIs, 22.2 for venlafaxine, 12.6 for duloxetine, 21.5 for mianserin, 32.8 for mirtazapine, 31.6 for tianeptine and 24.6 for agomelatine initiators. Initiation of antidepressants of interest versus SSRIs was not associated with an increased risk of serious liver injury [adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval): venlafaxine 1.17 (0.83-1.64), duloxetine 0.54 (0.28-1.02), mianserin 0.90 (0.58-1.41), mirtazapine 1.17 (0.67-2.02), tianeptine 1.35 (0.82-2.23) and agomelatine 1.07 (0.51-2.23)]. This finding was confirmed by the results of an additional study using a case-time-control design.

conclusionThese results do not provide evidence of an increased risk of serious liver injury following initiation of SNRIs or 'other antidepressants' compared with SSRIs in real-life practice. This could reflect an inherent lack of difference in risk between the drug classes, or the fact that individuals with higher susceptibility to drug-induced liver injury are not prescribed drugs considered to be more hepatotoxic.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntidepressive AgentsCase-Control StudiesChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryCohort StudiesDepressionFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsProportional Hazards ModelsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID29959758
PMCPMC6061298
OpenAlexW2811135974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.