Trial reportNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2018
Comparison of Single-Session Dose Response Effects of Whole Body Vibration on Spasticity and Walking Speed in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.
Trial report in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02340910 (Dose-Response Effects of Whole Body Vibration on Spasticity and Walking in SCI), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dose-Response Effects of Whole Body Vibration on Spasticity and Walking in SCI
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of whole-body vibration on neuropathic pain and the relationship between pain and spasticity in persons with spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2022Trial
- Immediate Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation on Stretch-Induced Spasticity in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation Modulates Spinal Reflex Circuit Excitability in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on Ankle Control and Walking Speed in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Multi-session transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation prevents chloride homeostasis imbalance and the development of hyperreflexia after spinal cord injury in rat.Experimental neurology · 2024Article
- Multi-session transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation prevents chloridehomeostasis imbalance and the development of spasticity after spinal cordinjury in rat.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Is There a New Road to Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation? A Case Report about the Effects of Driving a Go-Kart on Muscle Spasticity.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Acceptability and impact on spasticity of a single session of upper extremity vibration in individuals with tetraplegia.Spinal cord series and cases · 2022Article
- Effects of Skin Stimulation on Sensory-Motor Networks Excitability: Possible Implications for Physical Training in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Efficacy of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation versus Whole Body Vibration for Spasticity Reduction in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Meeting Proceedings for SCI 2020: Launching a Decade of Disruption in Spinal Cord Injury Research.Journal of neurotrauma · 2021Review
- Immediate Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation on Motor Function in Chronic, Sensorimotor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Vibration attenuates spasm-like activity in humans with spinal cord injury.The Journal of physiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spasticity affects approximately 65% of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and negatively impacts function and quality of life. Whole body vibration (WBV) appears to reduce spasticity and improve walking function; however, the optimal dose (frequency/duration) is not known. We compared single-session effects of four different WBV frequency/duration dose conditions on spasticity and walking speed, in preparation for a planned multi-session study. Thirty-five participants with motor-incomplete SCI received four different doses of WBV: high frequency (50 Hz)/short duration (180 s), high frequency/long duration (360 s), low frequency (30 Hz)/short duration, and low frequency/long duration, plus a control intervention consisting of sham electrical stimulation. In all conditions, participants stood on the WBV platform for 45-s bouts with 1 min rest between bouts until the requisite duration was achieved. The frequency/duration dose order was randomized across participants; sessions were separated by at least 1 week. Quadriceps spasticity was measured using the pendulum test at four time points during each session: before, immediately after, 15 min after, and 45 min after WBV. Walking speed was quantified using the 10-m walk test at three time points during each session: baseline, immediately after, and 45 min after WBV. In the full group analysis, no frequency/duration combination was significantly different from the sham-control condition. In participants with more severe spasticity, a greater reduction in stretch reflex excitability was associated with the high frequency/long duration WBV condition. The sham-control condition was associated with effects, indicating that the activity of repeated sitting and standing may have a beneficial influence on spasticity.
trial registrationNCT02340910 (assigned 01/19/2015).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.