Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29959653›Full record

Trial reportNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2018

Comparison of Single-Session Dose Response Effects of Whole Body Vibration on Spasticity and Walking Speed in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.

Stephen Estes, Jennifer A Iddings, Somu Ray, Neva J Kirk-Sanchez, Edelle C Field-Fote

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02340910 (Dose-Response Effects of Whole Body Vibration on Spasticity and Walking in SCI), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02340910 nacompletednot on this map

Dose-Response Effects of Whole Body Vibration on Spasticity and Walking in SCI

TypeinterventionalSponsorShepherd Center, Atlanta GARan2015 to 2020Enrolled46ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuryArmsShort Duration, Long Duration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen EstesShepherd Center - Crawford Research Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jennifer A IddingsShepherd Center - Crawford Research Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Somu RayShepherd Center - Crawford Research Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Neva J Kirk-SanchezDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Miami - Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Edelle C Field-FoteShepherd Center - Crawford Research Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA. Edelle_Field-Fote@Shepherd.org.

Funding

Dose-Response Effects of Whole Body Vibration on Spasticity and Walking in SCIR01HD079009 · NICHD · SHEPHERD CENTER · PI FIELD-FOTE, EDELLE C. · 2014 to 2019
$1.6M
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development HD079009-02NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spasticity affects approximately 65% of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and negatively impacts function and quality of life. Whole body vibration (WBV) appears to reduce spasticity and improve walking function; however, the optimal dose (frequency/duration) is not known. We compared single-session effects of four different WBV frequency/duration dose conditions on spasticity and walking speed, in preparation for a planned multi-session study. Thirty-five participants with motor-incomplete SCI received four different doses of WBV: high frequency (50 Hz)/short duration (180 s), high frequency/long duration (360 s), low frequency (30 Hz)/short duration, and low frequency/long duration, plus a control intervention consisting of sham electrical stimulation. In all conditions, participants stood on the WBV platform for 45-s bouts with 1 min rest between bouts until the requisite duration was achieved. The frequency/duration dose order was randomized across participants; sessions were separated by at least 1 week. Quadriceps spasticity was measured using the pendulum test at four time points during each session: before, immediately after, 15 min after, and 45 min after WBV. Walking speed was quantified using the 10-m walk test at three time points during each session: baseline, immediately after, and 45 min after WBV. In the full group analysis, no frequency/duration combination was significantly different from the sham-control condition. In participants with more severe spasticity, a greater reduction in stretch reflex excitability was associated with the high frequency/long duration WBV condition. The sham-control condition was associated with effects, indicating that the activity of repeated sitting and standing may have a beneficial influence on spasticity.

trial registrationNCT02340910 (assigned 01/19/2015).

Indexed as

Human BodyAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle SpasticityPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPsychophysicsSeverity of Illness IndexSpinal Cord InjuriesTime FactorsVibrationWalking SpeedAfferent inputHyperreflexiaOscillationPendulum testStimulation

Identifiers

PMID29959653
PMCPMC6095785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.