ArticleNeurosurgical review2019
Anatomical evaluation of intracranial aneurysm rupture risk in patients with multiple aneurysms.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- Risk factors and predictive indicators of rupture in cerebral aneurysms.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Clinical management of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm.Frontiers in stroke · 2024Review
- Risk analysis of intracranial aneurysm rupture based on the arterial segment of origin.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Fluid dynamics in intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents: effect of multiple geometrical parameters.Journal of fluid mechanics · 2023Article
- True Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms with High Risk of Rupture despite Very Small Diameter.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2022Article
- Hemodynamic indicators of the formation of tandem intracranial aneurysm based on a vascular restoration algorithm.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Asymmetry of P1 and vertebral arteries is not related to basilar tip aneurysm development or rupture.Acta neurochirurgica · 2021Article
- A pilot study using a machine-learning approach of morphological and hemodynamic parameters for predicting aneurysms enhancement.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and multiple aneurysms, there is a need to objectively identify the ruptured aneurysm. Additionally, studying the intra-individual rupture risk of multiple aneurysms eliminates extrinsic risk factors and allows a focus on anatomical factors, which could be extrapolated to patients with single aneurysms too. Retrospective bi-center study (Department of Neurosurgery of the University Hospital Duesseldorf and Bern) on patients with multiple aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by the rupture of one of them. Parameters investigated were height, width, neck, shape, inflow angle, diameter of the proximal and distal arteries, width/neck ratio, height/width ratio, height/neck ratio, and localization. Statistical analysis and logistic regressions were performed by the R program, version 3.4.3. N = 186 patients with aSAH and multiple aneurysms were treated in either department from 2008 to 2016 (Bern: 2008-2016, 725 patients and 100 multiple aneurysms, Duesseldorf: 2012-2016, 355 patients, 86 multiple aneurysms). The mean age was 57 years. N = 119 patients had 2 aneurysms, N = 52 patients had 3 aneurysms, N = 14 had 4 aneurysms and N = 1 had 5 aneurysms. Eighty-four percent of ruptured aneurysms were significantly larger than the largest unruptured. Multilobularity of ruptured aneurysms was significantly higher than in unruptured. Metric variables describing the geometry (height, width, etc.) and shape are the most predictive for rupture. One or two of them alone are already reliable predictors. Ratios are completely redundant in saccular aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.