Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29959582›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2018

Bladder Preserving Trimodality Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Skyler B Johnson, James B Yu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Emerging therapeutic agents for genitourinary cancers.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2019
    Review
  8. Targeted regulation by ROCK2 on bladder carcinoma via Wnt signaling under hypoxia.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Skyler B JohnsonDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, HRT 138, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
James B YuDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, HRT 138, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. james.b.yu@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHere, we will review and summarize the current status and emerging data supporting the use of trimodality therapy as an alternative to cystectomy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. RECENT

findingsThere are no randomized-controlled data comparing radical cystectomy with bladder preserving trimodality therapy available for comparison. However, observational data suggests acceptable bladder preservation and functional outcomes in patients receiving bladder preserving trimodality therapy as well as similar oncologic outcomes in select patients compared to radical cystectomy. Future trials are focusing on new techniques and novel therapeutics in patients with bladder cancer. Bladder preserving trimodality therapy results in satisfactory quality of life and comparable disease outcomes for select patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder compared to cystectomy.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyHumansMuscle NeoplasmsNeoplasm InvasivenessOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPrognosisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBladder cancerBladder preservationMuscle-invasiveTrimodality therapy

Identifiers

PMID29959582
OpenAlexW2810349185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.