ArticleJournal of medical systems2018
Automated Anatomic Labeling Architecture for Content Discovery in Medical Imaging Repositories.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dicoogle Open Source: The Establishment of a New Paradigm in Medical Imaging.Journal of medical systems · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The combination of textual data with visual features is known to enhance medical image search capabilities. However, the most advanced imaging archives today only index the studies' available meta-data, often containing limited amounts of clinically useful information. This work proposes an anatomic labeling architecture, integrated with an open source archive software, for improved multimodal content discovery in real-world medical imaging repositories. The proposed solution includes a technical specification for classifiers in an extensible medical imaging archive, a classification database for querying over the extracted information, and a set of proof-of-concept convolutional neural network classifiers for identifying the presence of organs in computed tomography scans. The system automatically extracts the anatomic region features, which are saved in the proposed database for later consumption by multimodal querying mechanisms. The classifiers were evaluated with cross-validation, yielding a best F1-score of 96% and an average accuracy of 97%. We expect these capabilities to become common-place in production environments in the future, as automated detection solutions improve in terms of accuracy, computational performance, and interoperability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.