Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29959479›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2019

Combined antegrade and retrograde access to difficult ureters: revisiting the rendezvous technique.

S R Keoghane, S J Deverill, J Woodhouse, V Shennoy, T Johnston, P Osborn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S R KeoghaneDepartments of Urology and Radiology, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Portsmouth and Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK. srkeo@hotmail.com.
S J DeverillDepartments of Urology and Radiology, Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
J WoodhouseDepartments of Urology and Radiology, Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
V ShennoyDepartments of Urology and Radiology, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Portsmouth and Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK.
T JohnstonDepartments of Urology and Radiology, West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Portsmouth and Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK.
P OsbornDepartments of Urology and Radiology, Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust · GBWest Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComplex ureteric strictures present a significant challenge to the endourologist and uro-radiologist. Multiple separate interventions to try to cross the stricture are often attempted. We describe our experience managing a heterogenous patient group using the 'rendezvous' procedure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 16 patients and 18 ureters (one bilateral procedure, and two separate procedures in one patient) underwent rendezvous procedures. Seven patients had coexisting ureteric calculi treated. Each case was followed up for between 3 months and 5 years.

resultsIn 16/18 ureters there was technical success at time of surgery; successfully crossing the stricture, allowing ureteroscopic access to the ureter, dilating and/or stenting the ureter. 2/18 were unsuccessful; one secondary to advanced malignancy resulting in a uretero-vaginal fistula and the second a failure to remove a retained, displaced ureteric stent. Of the 18 ureteric procedures; 7/18 were stent free at 3 months, improving to 8/18 stent free at 6 months. 4/18 remained nephrostomy dependent (failure of drainage despite stent or failure to stent) at 3 months, increasing to 6/18 being nephrostomy dependent at 6 months. 1/16 remained dialysis dependent with a nephrostomy tube. For those procedures involving ureteric calculi, 6/7 were stone free and 1/5 had a persistent stone fragment requiring further intervention.

conclusionsA combined approach may decrease the number of separate interventions required, with the aim of removing the need for a long-term nephrostomy, as well as providing opportunity to treat ureteric calculi in the context of stricture disease. Our experience has been that where the rendezvous has been required to treat strictures caused by malignant extrinsic compression, stenting has not been successful; this information is key to informed consent in a group of patients who may have a limited life expectancy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUreterUreteral CalculiUreteral ObstructionUreteroscopyRendezvous techniqueUreteric obstructionUreteric strictureUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID29959479
OpenAlexW2810706001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.