Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29959469›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2018

The beliefs of rheumatoid arthritis patients in their subcutaneous biological drug: strengths and areas of concern.

Luis Cea-Calvo, Enrique Raya, Carlos Marras, Tarek C Salman-Monte, Ana Ortiz, Georgina Salvador, Indalecio Monteagudo, Loreto Carmona, Sabela Fernandez, Maria J Arteaga and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luis Cea-CalvoMedical Affairs Department, Merck Sharp & Dohme S.A., Calle de Josefa Valcárcel 38, 28027, Madrid, Spain. luis.cea@merck.com.
Enrique RayaHospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain.
Carlos MarrasHospital Universitario Virgen de Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Tarek C Salman-MonteHospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana OrtizHospital La Princesa, IIS La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Georgina SalvadorHospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Indalecio MonteagudoHospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Loreto CarmonaInstituto de Salud Musculoesquelética (InMusc), Madrid, Spain.
Sabela FernandezMedical Affairs Department, Merck Sharp & Dohme S.A., Calle de Josefa Valcárcel 38, 28027, Madrid, Spain.
Maria J ArteagaMedical Affairs Department, Merck Sharp & Dohme S.A., Calle de Josefa Valcárcel 38, 28027, Madrid, Spain.
Jaime Calvo-AllénHospital Txagorritxu, Araba, Vitoria, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients' beliefs about their prescribed medication are an important factor influencing intentional non-adherence. This study describes rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients' beliefs about their subcutaneous (SC) biological medication through the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), and potential associations. As part of the ARCO study (Study on Adherence of Rheumatoid arthritis patients to subCutaneous and Oral drugs), patients completed the BMQ specifically for their SC biological medication, encompassing a necessity and a concerns scale. The medication possession ratio (MPR) was calculated to assess adherence to the SC biological medication. The BMQ was completed by 321 patients. Between 71.0 and 89.7% of patients agreed/strongly agreed with necessity scale statements, and only 7.2% had low necessity scores. Between 20.0 and 49.8% of patients agreed/strongly agreed with four of five concern scale statements, and 72.3% agreed/strongly agreed with the concern statement regarding long-term medication effects. The percentage with high concerns was 58.9%, and was higher in patients not satisfied with, or with less fulfillment of, tolerability expectations. Non-adherence percentages were, respectively, 13.8 and 13.0% (p = 0.919) in those with high or low necessity, and 16.0 and 10.6% (p = 0.171) in those with high or low concerns. Most patients were categorized as 'ambivalent' (58.5%; high necessity/high concerns) or 'accepting' (36.1%; high necessity/low concerns) of their SC biological medication. The BMQ identified patients' concerns with their SC biological medication. Because patients' concerns could influence non-adherence to medication and future outcomes, physicians should address this issue in the clinic by informing patients and setting clear expectations.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMedication AdherenceRetrospective StudiesSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsBeliefs in biological medicationNon-adherenceRheumatoid arthritisSubcutaneous

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.