Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29959372›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Based on Data Partition and Semi-Random Subspace Method.

Yuming Ma, Yihui Liu, Jinyong Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. HIV-1 Vif protein sequence variations in South African people living with HIV and their influence on Vif-APOBEC3G interaction.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Molecular genetic variability ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Contiguously hydrophobic sequences are functionally significant throughout the human exome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuming MaCollege of Information, Qilu University of Technology(Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4519-4211
Yihui LiuCollege of Information, Qilu University of Technology(Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, China. yxl@qlu.edu.cn.
Jinyong ChengCollege of Information, Qilu University of Technology(Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 61375013Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation) ZR2013FM020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein secondary structure prediction is one of the most important and challenging problems in bioinformatics. Machine learning techniques have been applied to solve the problem and have gained substantial success in this research area. However there is still room for improvement toward the theoretical limit. In this paper, we present a novel method for protein secondary structure prediction based on a data partition and semi-random subspace method (PSRSM). Data partitioning is an important strategy for our method. First, the protein training dataset was partitioned into several subsets based on the length of the protein sequence. Then we trained base classifiers on the subspace data generated by the semi-random subspace method, and combined base classifiers by majority vote rule into ensemble classifiers on each subset. Multiple classifiers were trained on different subsets. These different classifiers were used to predict the secondary structures of different proteins according to the protein sequence length. Experiments are performed on 25PDB, CB513, CASP10, CASP11, CASP12, and T100 datasets, and the good performance of 86.38%, 84.53%, 85.51%, 85.89%, 85.55%, and 85.09% is achieved respectively. Experimental results showed that our method outperforms other state-of-the-art methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerProtein Structure, SecondaryComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID29959372
PMCPMC6026213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.