Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29959244›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2018

Environmental Sampling as a Low-Technology Method for Surveillance of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in an Area of Endemicity.

Claire Colenutt, Emma Brown, Noel Nelson, Jemma Wadsworth, Jenny Maud, Bishnu Adhikari, Sharmila Chapagain Kafle, Mukul Upadhyaya, Samjhana Kafle Pandey, David J Paton and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Claire ColenuttThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom claire.colenutt@pirbright.ac.uk.
Emma BrownThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Noel NelsonThe Met Office, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Jemma WadsworthThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Jenny MaudEuropean Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (EuFMD), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Bishnu AdhikariEuropean Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (EuFMD), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Sharmila Chapagain KafleFMD and TADs Laboratory, Department of Livestock Services, Ministry of Livestock Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Mukul UpadhyayaVeterinary Epidemiology Centre, Department of Livestock Services, Ministry of Livestock Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Samjhana Kafle PandeyDirectorate of Animal Health, Department of Livestock Services, Ministry of Livestock Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
David J PatonThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Keith SumptionEuropean Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (EuFMD), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Simon GubbinsThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0538-4173
The Pirbright Institute · GBFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · ITGovernment of Nepal · NPMet Office · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental sampling enables disease surveillance beyond regular investigation of observed clinical cases, extending data on the circulation of a pathogen in a specific area. Developing straightforward, low-technology methods suitable for use under field conditions is key to the inclusion of such approaches alongside traditional surveillance techniques. Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is an economically important livestock pathogen, affecting cloven-hoofed livestock in many countries. Countries with FMDV face severe trade restrictions, and infections can have long-term effects on the productivity of affected animals. Environmental contamination by the virus in excretions and secretions from infected individuals promotes transmission but also presents an opportunity for noninvasive sample collection, facilitating diagnostic and surveillance activities. We present environmental sampling methods that have been tested in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, where FMDV is endemic. A total of nine sites were visited and sampled between November 2016 and November 2017. Environmental swabs collected from sites with reported outbreaks of FMD were used to demonstrate successful detection of FMDV RNA from the environment. The development of methods that can reliably detect FMDV RNA in the environment is significant, since this possibility extends the toolbox available for surveillance for this disease. Similar methods have already been deployed in the effort to eradicate polio, and with FMDV, such methods could easily be deployed in the event of an outbreak to provide additional resources for detection that would relieve pressure on veterinary services. The development of low-technology, straightforward surveillance methods such as these can support a robust response to outbreaks.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesDisease OutbreaksEndemic DiseasesEnvironmental MonitoringEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusLivestockNepalRNA, ViralSampling StudiesSpecimen HandlingRNA, Viralenvironmental surveillanceFMDfoot-and-mouth diseasefoot-and-mouth disease virusrRT-PCRviral detection

Identifiers

PMID29959244
PMCPMC6070757
OpenAlexW2805442176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.