Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29959204›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Extreme stability in de novo-designed repeat arrays is determined by unusually stable short-range interactions.

Kathryn Geiger-Schuller, Kevin Sforza, Max Yuhas, Fabio Parmeggiani, David Baker, Doug Barrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Stability and cooperativity in chimeric de novo TIM barrels via quarter swapping.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Modular repeat protein sculpting using rigid helical junctions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathryn Geiger-SchullerDepartment of Biophysics and Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Kevin SforzaDepartment of Biophysics and Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Max YuhasDepartment of Biophysics and Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
Fabio ParmeggianiInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-1090
David BakerInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0001-7896-6217
Doug BarrickDepartment of Biophysics and Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218; barrick@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7291-1389

Funding

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007231 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN DOREN, MARK B · 1985 to 2020
$18.4M
PROGRAM IN MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICST32GM008403 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BARRICK, DOUGLAS E. · 1990 to 2019
$13.5M
REPEAT-PROTEINS;STABILITY, FOLDING KINETICS &EVOLUTIONR01GM068462 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BARRICK, DOUGLAS E. · 2005 to 2025
$6.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068462NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007231NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designed helical repeats (DHRs) are modular helix-loop-helix-loop protein structures that are tandemly repeated to form a superhelical array. Structures combining tandem DHRs demonstrate a wide range of molecular geometries, many of which are not observed in nature. Understanding cooperativity of DHR proteins provides insight into the molecular origins of Rosetta-based protein design hyperstability and facilitates comparison of energy distributions in artificial and naturally occurring protein folds. Here, we use a nearest-neighbor Ising model to quantify the intrinsic and interfacial free energies of four different DHRs. We measure the folding free energies of constructs with varying numbers of internal and terminal capping repeats for four different DHR folds, using guanidine-HCl and glycerol as destabilizing and solubilizing cosolvents. One-dimensional Ising analysis of these series reveals that, although interrepeat coupling energies are within the range seen for naturally occurring repeat proteins, the individual repeats of DHR proteins are intrinsically stable. This favorable intrinsic stability, which has not been observed for naturally occurring repeat proteins, adds to stabilizing interfaces, resulting in extraordinarily high stability. Stable repeats also impart a downhill shape to the energy landscape for DHR folding. These intrinsic stability differences suggest that part of the success of Rosetta-based design results from capturing favorable local interactions.

Indexed as

Helix-Loop-Helix MotifsModels, MolecularEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinEscherichia coli ProteinsDHRsIsing modelprotein designrepeat proteinsRosetta

Identifiers

PMID29959204
PMCPMC6055163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.