Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29959107›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Learnability of a Configurator Empowering End Users to Create Mobile Data Collection Instruments: Usability Study.

Johannes Schobel, Rüdiger Pryss, Thomas Probst, Winfried Schlee, Marc Schickler, Manfred Reichert

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06792461 (A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Implementation of an eHealth Platform for Promoting Healthy Habits Among Adolescents From Socially Disadvantaged Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06792461 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Implementation of an eHealth Platform for Promoting Healthy Habits Among Adolescents From Socially Disadvantaged Settings: the ePro-Schools Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundació Sant Joan de DéuRan2025 to 2027Enrolled1,000ConditionsHealth Promotion, Health Education, Physical Activity, NutritionArmsPhysical activity and nutritional behavioural intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Measuring Mental Effort for Creating Mobile Data Collection Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Human Factors and Sociotechnical Issues.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johannes SchobelInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6874-9478
Rüdiger PryssInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1522-785X
Thomas ProbstDepartment for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6113-2133
Winfried SchleeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7942-1788
Marc SchicklerInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4774-6670
Manfred ReichertInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2536-4153

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany research domains still heavily rely on paper-based data collection procedures, despite numerous associated drawbacks. The QuestionSys framework is intended to empower researchers as well as clinicians without programming skills to develop their own smart mobile apps in order to collect data for their specific scenarios.

objectiveIn order to validate the feasibility of this model-driven, end-user programming approach, we conducted a study with 80 participants.

methodsAcross 2 sessions (7 days between Session 1 and Session 2), participants had to model 10 data collection instruments (5 at each session) with the developed configurator component of the framework. In this context, performance measures like the time and operations needed as well as the resulting errors were evaluated. Participants were separated into two groups (ie, novices vs experts) based on prior knowledge in process modeling, which is one fundamental pillar of the QuestionSys framework.

resultsStatistical analysis (t tests) revealed that novices showed significant learning effects for errors (P=.04), operations (P<.001), and time (P<.001) from the first to the last use of the configurator. Experts showed significant learning effects for operations (P=.001) and time (P<.001), but not for errors as the experts' errors were already very low at the first modeling of the data collection instrument. Moreover, regarding the time and operations needed, novices got significantly better at the third modeling task than experts were at the first one (t tests; P<.001 for time and P=.002 for operations). Regarding errors, novices did not get significantly better at working with any of the 10 data collection instruments than experts were at the first modeling task, but novices' error rates for all 5 data collection instruments at Session 2 were not significantly different anymore from those of experts at the first modeling task. After 7 days of not using the configurator (from Session 1 to Session 2), the experts' learning effect at the end of Session 1 remained stable at the beginning of Session 2, but the novices' learning effect at the end of Session 1 showed a significant decay at the beginning of Session 2 regarding time and operations (t tests; P<.001 for time and P=.03 for operations).

conclusionsIn conclusion, novices were able to use the configurator properly and showed fast (but unstable) learning effects, resulting in their performances becoming as good as those of experts (which were already good) after having little experience with the configurator. Following this, researchers and clinicians can use the QuestionSys configurator to develop data collection apps for smart mobile devices on their own.

Indexed as

data collectionmHealthmobile apps

Identifiers

PMID29959107
PMCPMC6045789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.