ArticleVision research2018
A spatial frequency spectral peakedness model predicts discrimination performance of regularity in dot patterns.
Article in Vision research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous Regularity Contrast and Luminance Polarity.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Different symmetries, different mechanisms.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Visual perception of texture regularity: Conjoint measurements and a wavelet response-distribution model.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subjective assessments of spatial regularity are common in everyday life and also in science, for example in developmental biology. It has recently been shown that regularity is an adaptable visual dimension. It was proposed that regularity is coded via the peakedness of the distribution of neural responses across receptive field size. Here, we test this proposal for jittered square lattices of dots. We examine whether discriminability correlates with a simple peakedness measure across different presentation conditions (dot number, size, and average spacing). Using a filter-rectify-filter model, we determined responses across scale. Consistently, two peaks are present: a lower frequency peak corresponding to the dot spacing of the regular pattern and a higher frequency peak corresponding to the pattern element (dot). We define the "peakedness" of a particular presentation condition as the relative heights of these two peaks for a perfectly regular pattern constructed using the corresponding dot size, number and spacing. We conducted two psychophysical experiments in which observers judged relative regularity in a 2-alternative forced-choice task. In the first experiment we used a single reference pattern of intermediate regularity and, in the second, Thurstonian scaling of patterns covering the entire range of regularity. In both experiments discriminability was highly correlated with peakedness for a wide range of presentation conditions. This supports the hypothesis that regularity is coded via peakedness of the distribution of responses across scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.