ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2018
Cognition comes of age: comments on the new FDA draft guidance for early Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Cognitive Endpoints in Huntington's Disease Trials: A Conceptual Framework for Clinical Meaningfulness.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026Article
- US, EU, and Japanese Regulatory Guidelines for Development of Drugs for Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: Implications for Global Drug Development.Clinical and translational science · 2020Review
- The clinical promise of biomarkers of synapse damage or loss in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2020Review
- Are large simple trials for dementia prevention possible?Age and ageing · 2020Article
- Commentary: Composite cognitive and functional measures for early stage Alzheimer's disease trials.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- FDA position statement "Early Alzheimer's disease: Developing drugs for treatment, Guidance for Industry".Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2019Review
- Questions concerning the role of amyloid-β in the definition, aetiology and diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.Acta neuropathologica · 2018Review
- Performance-based instrument to assess functional capacity in community-dwelling older adults.Dementia & neuropsychologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe FDA have recently published draft guidance for the development of treatments for early Alzheimer's disease. Key features of this guidance are the advocacy of sensitive cognitive measures and a taxonomy of disease severity. Whilst desirable patterns of cognitive-functional improvement are included, specific measures, and the magnitude of required effects, are not described. MAIN SECTION: We describe key elements of the guidance content, especially with regard targeting key cognitive domains and the means by which they might be efficiently indexed in the disease stages included in the guidance. We discuss also the opportunities to assess cognitive performance in 'Stage 2' and 'Stage 3' patients, as well as the possibilities for effectively assessing function in the latter category. In this section we review candidate cognitive assessments that we judge are capable of delivering on the guidance specification for sensitive neuropsychological measures. This includes detailed consideration of the ADCS-PACC and Catch-Cog initiatives. With respect to the magnitude of effects, we propose that standardised effect sizes of 0.3 represent a reasonable level of efficacy based on the observation that already marketed drugs on average deliver this level of improvement.
conclusionsWe propose the use of cognitive measures in stage 2 patients to index the cognitive skills known to be compromised early in the Alzheimer's disease process. We recommend extending the traditional interest in episodic memory to include sensitive, reliable and valid measures of attention, working memory and aspects of executive function. We propose a focus on these additional cognitive abilities based on evidence that performance on tests of these domains is moderately well related to functional skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.