Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29958288›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

The importance of using public data to validate reported associations.

Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Jonathan Beesley, Paul D P Pharoah, Andrew Berchuck

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Georgia Chenevix-TrenchQueensland Institute of Medical Research Berghofer, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1878-2587
Jonathan BeesleyQueensland Institute of Medical Research Berghofer, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Paul D P PharoahCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Andrew BerchuckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

Ovarian cancer GWAS discovery, expansion and replication (N2 - Project #1)U19CA148112 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI SELLERS, THOMAS A · 2010 to 2014
$10.2M
Cancer Research UK 10119Cancer Research UK 16561NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148112Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 076113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID29958288
PMCPMC6025853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.