Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29958227›Full record

ReviewAnnals of surgery2019

A Roadmap for Aspiring Surgeon-Scientists in Today's Healthcare Environment.

Allan M Goldstein, Alex B Blair, Sundeep G Keswani, Ankush Gosain, Michael Morowitz, John S Kuo, Matthew Levine, Nita Ahuja, David J Hackam, Basic Science Committee of the Society of University Surgeons

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Viewpoint: are surgeon-scientists still worth the investment?Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The development, validity, and reliability of the Researcher Investment Tool.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Trends in Specialty Training and National Institutes of Health Funding Among Surgeon-Scientists.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Physician-scientists in the United States at 2020: Trends and concerns.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Allan M GoldsteinDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Alex B BlairDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Sundeep G KeswaniLaboratory for Regenerative Tissue Repair, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Ankush GosainDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center and Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Michael MorowitzChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
John S KuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Matthew LevineTransplant Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Nita AhujaDepartment of Surgery, Yale-New Haven Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
David J HackamDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Johns Hopkins Children's Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Basic Science Committee of the Society of University Surgeons

Funding

Clinical and Laboratory Research Training for Surgical OncologistsT32CA126607 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMERON, ANDREW M. · 2008 to 2024
$6.0M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA126607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurgeon-scientists are an essential component of the field of academic surgery, contributing to the fundamental understanding of disease and the discovery of innovative therapies. Despite this recognized value, the current landscape of academic medicine presents significant barriers to establishing and maintaining a successful career as a surgeon performing basic/translational research. Our objective is to define these barriers to academic success for surgeons, and to provide a consensus strategy for optimizing the chances of success. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is a significant decline in the proportion of academic surgeons who are pursuing basic science/translational research, which represents a potential threat to the very identify of the translational surgeon-scientist.

methodsBased on published literature and expert opinion, the Basic Science Committee of the Society of University of Surgeons prepared this roadmap to encourage and guide the next generation of surgeon-scientists as they embark on their academic careers.

resultsThis roadmap highlights key elements to consider in choosing an initial job and the importance of identifying a team of committed mentors. Expectations and guidelines for the first several years in practice are offered.

conclusionsWith guidance and mentorship, aspiring surgeonscientists can overcome the challenges inherent in choosing this career path and sustain the important legacy of those before them.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceMentorsBiomedical ResearchEducation, Medical, GraduateGeneral SurgeryHumansSurgeonsTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID29958227
PMCPMC6298819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.