Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29958199›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography

Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Assessment of the Activity of Crohn Disease: 1.5 or 3 T.

Ahmed Abd-El Khalek Abd-ALRazek, Dalia Monir Fahmy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Unexpected Gastric Subepithelial Mass.Oman medical journal · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed Abd-El Khalek Abd-ALRazek
Dalia Monir Fahmy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in assessment of the activity of Crohn disease (CD) and to explore differences between DWI in 3 T and 1.5 T.

methodsPostcontrast magnetic resonance enterography with DWI of 72 patients with pathological proof of CD was retrospectively evaluated for restricted diffusion qualitatively and quantitavely in 3 T (n = 40) and 1.5 T (n = 32). Magnetic resonance activity score of 7 or higher was used as reference of activity.

resultsFifty-five patients had active lesions. Diffusion-weighted imaging hyperintensity showed sensitivity (100%, 100%) and specificity (88.89%, 100%) in 1.5/3 T for activity assessment. Mean ± SD apparent diffusion coefficient for active lesions was 1.21 ± 0.42 and 1.28 ± 0.59 × 10 mm/s in 1.5 and 3 T, respectively. The proposed cutoff values of 1.35 and 1.38 × 10 mm/s in 1.5 and 3 T, respectively, had sensitivity (80%, 93%), specificity (100%, 90%), accuracy (88%, 93%), and no significant difference in accuracy between 1.5/3 T (P = 0.48).

conclusionsDiffusion-weighted imaging hypersensitivity and apparent diffusion coefficient values accurately assessed the activity of CD. No significant statistical difference in diagnostic accuracy was detected between 1.5 and 3 T.

Indexed as

AdultCrohn DiseaseDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID29958199
PMCPMC6296832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.