ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography
Single-Shot Coronary Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective Magnetic Resonance Angiography Using Compressed Sensing: A Feasibility Study in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-contrast MR angiography of pelvic arterial vasculature using the Quiescent interval slice selective (QISS) sequence.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- Coronary Artery Magnetic Resonance Angiography Combined with Computed Tomography Angiography in Diagnosis of Coronary Heart Disease by Reconstruction Algorithm.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Quantification of popliteal artery narrowing with QISS MRA during active ankle plantarflexion in healthy, asymptomatic volunteers and its potential application in the diagnosis of popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES).Skeletal radiology · 2021Article
- Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine whether it is feasible to visualize the coronary origins in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) using single-shot coronary quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with compressed sensing (CS).
methodsThis retrospective study leveraged a parent study, which aimed to compare breath-hold, 2.1-fold accelerated, 2-shot coronary QISS MRA and clinical standard contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA in 14 patients with CHD (mean age, 17.0 ± 8.6 years, 6 females and 8 males). We evaluated the feasibility of single-shot coronary QISS MRA by retrospectively undersampling the 2-shot data set by an additional factor of 2, performing CS reconstruction, and comparing the retrospectively derived single-shot QISS MRA to 2-shot coronary QISS MRA and clinical standard CE MRA. For quantitative analysis, structural similarity index and normalized root mean square error were calculated. For qualitative analysis, 2 experienced readers scored the conspicuity of coronary origins on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = nondiagnostic, 2 = poor, 3 = clinically acceptable, 4 = good, 5 = excellent).
resultsCompared with 2-shot QISS, single-shot QISS produced normalized root mean square error of 5.8% ± 0.8% and structural similarity index of 95.4% ± 1.6%, suggesting high data fidelity by CS reconstruction. Compared with the mean conspicuity scores for clinical CE MRA (4.2 ± 0.5 and 4.1 ± 0.6 for right and left coronary origins, respectively), the mean conspicuity scores were not significantly different (P > 0.3) for 2-shot QISS (4.4 ± 0.9 and 4.2 ± 1.1, respectively) and single-shot QISS with CS (4.3 ± 1.1 and 3.8 ± 1.3, respectively) and deemed clinically acceptable to good (scores ≥3.0).
conclusionsThis study shows that it is feasible to visualize the coronary origins in patients with CHD with clinically acceptable to good image quality using single-shot coronary QISS MRA with CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.