Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29957822›Full record

ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2018

Differential impact of trait sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD inattention in early childhood on adolescent functioning.

Stephen P Becker, G Leonard Burns, Daniel R Leopold, Richard K Olson, Erik G Willcutt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Annual Research Review: Perspectives on progress in ADHD science - from characterization to cause.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Neuropsychological Functioning.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen P BeckerDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9046-5183
G Leonard BurnsDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Daniel R LeopoldDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7250-9998
Richard K OlsonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Erik G WillcuttDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Boulder · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USWashington State University · US

Funding

VALIDITY OF SUBTYPES OF ADHDP50HD027802 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI ERIK G WILLCUTT · 1990 to 2026
$44.9M
Longitudinal Twin Study of Early Reading Development (supplement)R01HD038526 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI OLSON, RICHARD K · 2000 to 2010
$4.2M
Etiology and Neuropsychology of Math, Reading, ADHD, and their CovariationR01HD068728 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI PETRILL, STEPHEN A., WILLCUTT, ERIK G · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
Neurobiological Underpinnings of Math and Reading Comorbidity: A Twin StudyR24HD075460 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PETRILL, STEPHEN A. · 2012 to 2015
$2.4M
A Multi-Method Investigation to Distinguish Sluggish Cognitive Tempo from ADHDK23MH108603 · NIMH · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI BECKER, STEPHEN P · 2015 to 2019
$675k
Testing the Predictive Power of Structural Neuroimaging in the Estimation of Individuals' Reading and Attentional AbilitiesF31HD091967 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI LEOPOLD, DANIEL · 2017 to 2018
$72k
NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD091967NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD027802NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD038526NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068728NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD075460NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH108603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) is distinct from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder inattention (ADHD-IN) and concurrently associated with a range of impairment domains. However, few longitudinal studies have examined SCT as a longitudinal predictor of adjustment. Studies to date have all used a relatively short longitudinal time span (6 months to 2 years) and only rating scale measures of adjustment. Using a prospective, multi-method design, this study examined whether SCT and ADHD-IN were differentially associated with functioning over a 10-year period between preschool and the end of ninth grade.

methodsLatent state-trait modeling determined the trait variance (i.e. consistency across occasions) of SCT and ADHD-IN across four measurement points (preschool and the end of kindergarten, first grade, and second grade) in a large population-based longitudinal sample (N = 976). Regression analyses were used to examine trait SCT and ADHD-IN factors in early childhood as predictors of functioning at the end of ninth grade (i.e. parent ratings of psychopathology and social/academic functioning, reading and mathematics academic achievement scores, processing speed and working memory).

resultsBoth SCT and ADHD-IN contained more trait variance (Ms = 65% and 61%, respectively) than occasion-specific variance (Ms = 35% and 39%) in early childhood, with trait variance increasing as children progressed from preschool through early elementary school. In regression analyses: (a) SCT significantly predicted greater withdrawal and anxiety/depression whereas ADHD-IN did not uniquely predict these internalizing domains; (b) ADHD-IN uniquely predicted more externalizing behaviors whereas SCT uniquely predicted fewer externalizing behaviors; (c) SCT uniquely predicted shyness whereas both SCT and ADHD-IN uniquely predicted global social difficulties; and (d) ADHD-IN uniquely predicted poorer math achievement and slower processing speed whereas SCT more consistently predicted poorer reading achievement.

conclusionsFindings of this study - from the longest prospective sample to date - provide the clearest evidence yet that SCT and ADHD-IN often differ when it comes to the functional outcomes they predict.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsAttentionAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChild, PreschoolCognition DisordersColoradoFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProspective Studiesacademic achievementADHDattention-deficit/hyperactivity disordercomorbidityprocessing speedsluggish cognitive tempoworking memory

Identifiers

PMID29957822
PMCPMC6158103
OpenAlexW2810023105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.