Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29957745›Full record

ReviewActa bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis2018

The Italian Code of Medical Deontology. Historical, ethical and legal issues.

Sara Patuzzo, Francesco De Stefano, Rosagemma Ciliberti

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Medical Law in Dentistry and OMFS: KAP Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Information obligation in surgery.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Thomas Percival. Discussing the foundation of Medical Ethics.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara Patuzzo. sara.patuzzo@univr.it.
Francesco De Stefano. fdestefano@unige.it.
Rosagemma Ciliberti. rosellaciliberti@yahoo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimMedical deontology is increasingly important, owing to the interests and rights which the medical profession involves. This paper focuses on the relationships of the Italian Code of Medical Deontology (CMD) with both the ethical and legal dimensions, in order to clarify the role of medical ethics within the medical profession, society and the overall system of the sources of law.

methodsThe authors analyze the CMD from an ethical perspective and through the new doctrinal guidelines and current trends in the Italian law courts.

resultsFrom an ethical point of view,  moral philosophical analysis scarcely seems to  address professional medical ethics. Nonetheless, the CMD needs to undergo careful ethical analysis. From a legal perspective, the Italian CMD contains provisions which do not have  an official legal nature. However, they are directly binding for medical practitioners, and therefore could be understood as a supplement to the general rules of the legal system.

conclusionsAt an ethical level, rigorous debate on the CMD is indispensable, in order to update its specific principles and to make it a real moral normative document. At a legislative level, there is a possible contradiction between a legal system that does not take into account the CMD, but which then attributes significant importance to the violation of its rules.

Indexed as

Codes of EthicsEthics, DentalHistory of DentistryLegislation, DentalDentistryEthical AnalysisHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansItaly

Identifiers

PMID29957745
PMCPMC6179026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.