Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29957710›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2018

Use of a Novel, Electronic Health Record-Centered, Interprofessional ICU Rounding Simulation to Understand Latent Safety Issues.

James Bordley, Knewton K Sakata, Jesse Bierman, Karess McGrath, Ashley Mulanax, Linh Nguyen, Vishnu Mohan, Jeffrey A Gold

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Structure and concept of ICU rounds: the VIS-ITS survey.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James BordleyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Knewton K SakataDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Jesse BiermanDepartment of Pharmacy, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Karess McGrathDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Ashley MulanaxDepartment of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Linh NguyenDepartment of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Vishnu MohanDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Jeffrey A GoldDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

EHR solutions for accurate reporting of data on interprofessional ICU roundsR01HS023793 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GOLD, JEFFREY A. · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS023793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe electronic health record is a primary source of information for all professional groups participating in ICU rounds. We previously demonstrated that, individually, all professional groups involved in rounds have significant blind spots in recognition of patient safety issues in the electronic health record. However, it is unclear how team dynamics impacts identification and verbalization of viewed data. Therefore, we created an ICU rounding simulation to assess how the interprofessional team recognized and reported data and its impact on decision-making.

designEach member of the ICU team reviewed a simulated ICU chart in the electronic health record which contained embedded patient safety issues. The team conducted simulated rounds according to the ICU's existing rounding script and was assessed for recognition of safety issues.

settingAcademic medical center. SUBJECTS: ICU residents, nurses, and pharmacists.

interventionNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsTwenty-eight teams recognized 68.6% of safety issues with only 50% teams having the primary diagnosis in their differential. Individually, interns, nurses, and pharmacists recognized 30.4%, 15.6%, and 19.6% of safety items, respectively. However, there was a negative correlation between the intern's performance and the nurse's or the pharmacist's performance within a given team. The wide variance in recognition of data resulted in wide variance in orders. Overall, there were 21.8 orders requested and 21.6 orders placed per case resulting in 3.6 order entry inconsistencies/case. Between the two cases, there were 145 distinct orders place with 43% being unique to a specific team and only 2% placed by all teams.

conclusionsAlthough significant blind spots exist in the interprofessional team's ability to recognize safety issues in the electronic health record, the inclusion of other professional groups does serve as a partial safety net to improve recognition. Electronic health record-based, ICU rounding simulations can serve as a test-bed for innovations in ICU rounding structure and data collection.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelElectronic Health RecordsHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterdisciplinary CommunicationPatient Care TeamPatient-Centered CarePatient SafetyTeaching RoundsWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID29957710
PMCPMC6138563
OpenAlexW2810313917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.