ArticleCritical care medicine2018
Use of a Novel, Electronic Health Record-Centered, Interprofessional ICU Rounding Simulation to Understand Latent Safety Issues.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of Tailoring Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Ambient Scribes for Intensive Care Unit Rounds: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Impact of Electronic Medical Record Training on Pediatric Residents' Learning Outcomes: A Simulation-Based Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- Nursing Interventions and Care Strategies for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Comprehensive Review.Galen medical journal · 2023Article
- Translating ethnographic data into knowledge, skills, and attitude statements for medical scribes: a modified Delphi approach.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Structure and concept of ICU rounds: the VIS-ITS survey.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022Article
- Article
- The Impact of Electronic Health Record-Based Simulation During Intern Boot Camp: Interventional Study.JMIR medical education · 2021Article
- Simulation Training in the ICU.Chest · 2019Review
- Data Omission by Physician Trainees on ICU Rounds.Critical care medicine · 2019Observational
- Nursing workload associated with the frequency of multidisciplinary rounds: a cross-sectional study.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensivaArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe electronic health record is a primary source of information for all professional groups participating in ICU rounds. We previously demonstrated that, individually, all professional groups involved in rounds have significant blind spots in recognition of patient safety issues in the electronic health record. However, it is unclear how team dynamics impacts identification and verbalization of viewed data. Therefore, we created an ICU rounding simulation to assess how the interprofessional team recognized and reported data and its impact on decision-making.
designEach member of the ICU team reviewed a simulated ICU chart in the electronic health record which contained embedded patient safety issues. The team conducted simulated rounds according to the ICU's existing rounding script and was assessed for recognition of safety issues.
settingAcademic medical center. SUBJECTS: ICU residents, nurses, and pharmacists.
interventionNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsTwenty-eight teams recognized 68.6% of safety issues with only 50% teams having the primary diagnosis in their differential. Individually, interns, nurses, and pharmacists recognized 30.4%, 15.6%, and 19.6% of safety items, respectively. However, there was a negative correlation between the intern's performance and the nurse's or the pharmacist's performance within a given team. The wide variance in recognition of data resulted in wide variance in orders. Overall, there were 21.8 orders requested and 21.6 orders placed per case resulting in 3.6 order entry inconsistencies/case. Between the two cases, there were 145 distinct orders place with 43% being unique to a specific team and only 2% placed by all teams.
conclusionsAlthough significant blind spots exist in the interprofessional team's ability to recognize safety issues in the electronic health record, the inclusion of other professional groups does serve as a partial safety net to improve recognition. Electronic health record-based, ICU rounding simulations can serve as a test-bed for innovations in ICU rounding structure and data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.