ArticleMethods in cell biology2018
Analyzing the micromechanics of the cell division apparatus.
Article in Methods in cell biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitatively Analyzing the Morphological Growth Dynamics of Bipolar and Non-bipolar Spindles Using Xenopus Egg Extract.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Antiparallel microtubule bundling supports KIF15-driven mitotic spindle assembly.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024Article
- Molecular and cellular level characterization of cytoskeletal mechanics using a quartz crystal microbalance.Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell division involves mechanical processes, such as chromosome transport and centrosome separation. Quantitative micromanipulation-based approaches have been central to dissecting the forces driving these processes. We highlight two biophysical assays that can be employed for such analyses. First, an in vitro "mini-spindle" assay is described that can be used to examine the collective mechanics of mitotic motor proteins cross-linking two microtubules. In the spindle, motor proteins (e.g., kinesin-5, kinesin-14, and dynein) can localize to overlapping microtubules that slide relative to each other, work as an ensemble, and equilibrate between cytoplasm and the microtubules. The "mini-spindle" assay can recapitulate these features and allows measurements of forces generated between adjacent microtubules and their dependence on filament orientation, sliding speed, overlap length, and motor protein density. Second, we describe a force-calibrated microneedle-based "whole-spindle" micromechanics assay. Microneedle-based micromanipulation can be a useful technique to examine cellular scale mechanics, but its use has been restricted by the difficulty in getting probes to penetrate the plasma membrane without disrupting cell physiology. As detailed here, the use of cell-free extracts prepared from metaphase-arrested Xenopus eggs can address this limitation. These micromanipulation studies also benefit from the use of frozen stocks of Xenopus egg extract. Together, these approaches can be used to decipher how micromechanics and biochemical activities ensure successful cell division.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.