ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2018
Stanniocalcin 2 expression is associated with a favourable outcome in male breast cancer.
Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of high stanniocalcin 2 expression in solid cancers: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Identification of a metabolic-immune signature associated with prognosis in colon cancer and exploration of potential predictive efficacy of immunotherapy response.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Biological Basis of Breast Cancer-Related Disparities in Precision Oncology Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Stanniocalcin 2 (STC2): a universal tumour biomarker and a potential therapeutical target.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022Review
- Male breast cancer: an update.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022Review
- The significance of Stanniocalcin 2 in malignancies and mechanisms.Bioengineered · 2021Review
- Research progress of STC2 in breast cancer.Biophysics reports · 2021Article
- QuPath: The global impact of an open source digital pathology system.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- New Insights Into Physiological and Pathophysiological Functions of Stanniocalcin 2.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Review
- Role of stanniocalcin-1 in breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2019Review
- Effect of STC2 gene silencing on colorectal cancer cells.Molecular medicine reports · 2019Article
- Apoptotic caspases inhibit abscopal responses to radiation and identify a new prognostic biomarker for breast cancer patients.OncoimmunologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer can occur in either gender; however, it is rare in men, accounting for <1% of diagnosed cases. In a previous transcriptomic screen of male breast cancer (MBC) and female breast cancer (FBC) occurrences, we observed that Stanniocalcin 2 (STC2) was overexpressed in the former. The aim of this study was to confirm the expression of STC2 in MBC and to investigate whether this had an impact on patient prognosis. Following an earlier transcriptomic screen, STC2 gene expression was confirmed by RT-qPCR in matched MBC and FBC samples as well as in tumour-associated fibroblasts derived from each gender. Subsequently, STC2 protein expression was examined immunohistochemically in tissue microarrays containing 477 MBC cases. Cumulative survival probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate survival analysis was performed using the Cox hazard model. Gender-specific STC2 gene expression showed a 5.6-fold upregulation of STC2 transcripts in MBC, also supported by data deposited in Oncomine™. STC2 protein expression was a positive prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS; Log-rank; total p = 0.035, HR = 0.49; tumour cells p = 0.017, HR = 0.44; stroma p = 0.030, HR = 0.48) but had no significant impact on overall survival (Log-rank; total p = 0.23, HR = 0.71; tumour cells p = 0.069, HR = 0.59; stroma p = 0.650, HR = 0.87). Importantly, multivariate analysis adjusted for patient age at diagnosis, node staging, tumour size, ER, and PR status revealed that total STC2 expression as well as expression in tumour cells was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (Cox regression; p = 0.018, HR = 0.983; p = 0.015, HR = 0.984, respectively). In conclusion, STC2 expression is abundant in MBC where it is an independent prognostic factor for DFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.