Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29956424›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2018

One MRI-compatible tDCS session attenuates ventromedial cortical perfusion when exposed to verbal criticism: The role of perceived criticism.

Chris Baeken, Josefien Dedoncker, Jonathan Remue, Guo-Rong Wu, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Sara De Witte, Tasha Poppa, Jill M Hooley, Rudi De Raedt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Does non-invasive brain stimulation modulate emotional stress reactivity?Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chris BaekenDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9885-3041
Josefien DedonckerDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jonathan RemueDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Guo-Rong WuKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Marie-Anne VanderhasseltDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sara De WitteDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Tasha PoppaDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Jill M HooleyDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Rudi De RaedtDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEHarvard University Press · USSouthwest University · CNUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a potential treatment strategy for mood and anxiety disorders, but how this application may influence emotional processes, and whether this is related to individual characteristics, is not well understood. It has been proposed that perceived criticism (PC) may represent a vulnerability factor for the development of such mental illnesses. To decipher whether neural mechanisms of action of tDCS potentially differ depending on PC status (low vs. high), we evaluated mood and brain perfusion before and after applying MRI-compatible tDCS, and after participants were exposed to verbal criticism in the scanner. Experimental design 30 healthy nondepressed females were included in a sham-controlled crossover MRI-compatible tDCS study. Brain perfusion was measured by means of arterial spin labeling (ASL) before and after tDCS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and after hearing criticism. Before the experiment, all participants provided a rating of PC in their closest environment. Principal observations at the behavioral level, criticism made participants angrier. This was unrelated to the active or sham stimulation. After being criticized, females scoring high on PC had significantly decreased brain perfusion in the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pgACC) and medioprefrontal cortex (mPFC), after active tDCS but not sham. The decrease in pgACC/mPFC perfusion points to a significant impact of tDCS in brain areas related to stress responses and self-referential processes, especially in females scoring high on PC, which has been shown to be related to vulnerability for mood and anxiety disorders.

Indexed as

Social PerceptionAdultAffectBrain MappingCross-Over StudiesFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal CortexSpeech PerceptionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung Adultarterial spin labelingmedial prefrontal cortexperceived criticismtranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29956424
PMCPMC7133094
OpenAlexW2809895545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.