Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29956262›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as sentinels for the elucidation of Arctic environmental change processes: a comprehensive review combined with ArcRisk project results.

Pernilla Carlsson, Knut Breivik, Eva Brorström-Lundén, Ian Cousins, Jesper Christensen, Joan O Grimalt, Crispin Halsall, Roland Kallenborn, Khaled Abass, Gerhard Lammel and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. One health in the Arctic - connections and actions.International journal of circumpolar health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Research on Selected Wildlife Infections in the Circumpolar Arctic-A Bibliometric Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Persistent Organic Pollutants in Food: Contamination Sources, Health Effects and Detection Methods.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
  12. Temporal trends of contaminants in Arctic human populations.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 10 countries.

Pernilla CarlssonNorwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), 0349, Oslo, Norway. pernilla.carlsson@niva.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9253-8833
Knut BreivikNILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, 2027, Kjeller, Norway.
Eva Brorström-LundénIVL Swedish Environment Research Institute, 411 33, Göteborg, Sweden.
Ian CousinsDepartment of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES), Stockholm University, 11418, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jesper ChristensenDepartment of Bioscience, Arctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Joan O GrimaltInstitute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDÆA), Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), 0834, Barcelona, Spain.
Crispin HalsallLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.
Roland KallenbornFaculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Sciences (KBM), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Christian Magnus Falsen Veg 1, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Khaled AbassDepartment of Pesticides, Menoufia University, P.O. Box 32511, Shebeen El-Kom, Egypt.
Gerhard LammelMax Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
John MuntheIVL Swedish Environment Research Institute, 411 33, Göteborg, Sweden.
Matthew MacLeodDepartment of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES), Stockholm University, 11418, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jon Øyvind OdlandDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Janet PawlakArctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), AMAP Secretariat, Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway.
Arja RautioArctic Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, 90014, Oulu, Finland.
Lars-Otto ReiersenArctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), AMAP Secretariat, Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway.
Martin SchlabachNILU-Norwegian Institute for Air Research, 2027, Kjeller, Norway.
Irene StemmlerMax Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Simon WilsonArctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), AMAP Secretariat, Gaustadalléen 21, 0349, Oslo, Norway.
Henry WöhrnschimmelDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Institute of Chemical and Bioengineering, ETH Zürich, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Arctic Monitoring And Assessment Programme · NONILU · NOStockholm Environment Institute · SEStockholm University · SEAarhus University · DKETH Zurich · CHInstitute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research · ESLancaster University · GBMasaryk University · CZMax Planck Institute for Chemistry · DEMenoufia University · EGNorwegian Institute for Water Research · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

European Research Framework Program (FP7) 226534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) can be used as chemical sentinels for the assessment of anthropogenic influences on Arctic environmental change. We present an overview of studies on PCBs in the Arctic and combine these with the findings from ArcRisk-a major European Union-funded project aimed at examining the effects of climate change on the transport of contaminants to and their behaviour of in the Arctic-to provide a case study on the behaviour and impact of PCBs over time in the Arctic. PCBs in the Arctic have shown declining trends in the environment over the last few decades. Atmospheric long-range transport from secondary and primary sources is the major input of PCBs to the Arctic region. Modelling of the atmospheric PCB composition and behaviour showed some increases in environmental concentrations in a warmer Arctic, but the general decline in PCB levels is still the most prominent feature. 'Within-Arctic' processing of PCBs will be affected by climate change-related processes such as changing wet deposition. These in turn will influence biological exposure and uptake of PCBs. The pan-Arctic rivers draining large Arctic/sub-Arctic catchments provide a significant source of PCBs to the Arctic Ocean, although changes in hydrology/sediment transport combined with a changing marine environment remain areas of uncertainty with regard to PCB fate. Indirect effects of climate change on human exposure, such as a changing diet will influence and possibly reduce PCB exposure for indigenous peoples. Body burdens of PCBs have declined since the 1980s and are predicted to decline further.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionAnimalsArctic RegionsClimate ChangeEnvironmental MonitoringHumansIceModels, TheoreticalOceans and SeasPolychlorinated BiphenylsRiversSeasonsSoil PollutantsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAir PollutantsIcePolychlorinated BiphenylsSoil PollutantsWater Pollutants, ChemicalArcticClimate changeDistribution pathwaysEnvironmental fateEnvironmental propertiesPCBPolychlorinated biphenyls

Identifiers

PMID29956262
PMCPMC6096556
OpenAlexW2811356296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.