Observational studyInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018
Outcomes of warfarin therapy managed by pharmacists via hospital anticoagulation clinic versus online anticoagulation clinic.
Observational study in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness of "Internet + Pharmacy Care" Via the Alfalfa App in Warfarin Therapy Management After Cardiac Valve Replacement: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Trial
- Social App to Improve Warfarin Therapy in Post-MHVR Chinese Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2023Trial
- Real-world clinical validation study: individualized warfarin dosing strategy integrating genetic polymorphisms and Bayesian.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Fixed dose versus 3-day loading dose warfarin initiation in atrial fibrillation: effects on INR stabilization and time in the therapeutic range.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Application of eHealth Tools in Anticoagulation Management After Cardiac Valve Replacement: Scoping Review Coupled With Bibliometric Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- The Value of Anticoagulation Management Combining Telemedicine and Self-Testing in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023Article
- Efficacy and safety of app-based remote warfarin management during COVID-19-related lockdown: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2022Article
- Combining portable coagulometers with the Internet: A new model of warfarin anticoagulation in patients following mechanical heart valve replacement.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Effectiveness of the Alfalfa App in Warfarin Therapy Management for Patients Undergoing Venous Thrombosis Prevention and Treatment: Cohort Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Observational
- [Pharmacist-led anticoagulation monitoring can significantly improve the effectiveness and safety of warfarin for patients during hospitalization].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020Article
- Evaluation of a program of pharmaceutical counseling for French patients on oral anticoagulant therapy.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020Article
- Article
- Effect of Gene-Based Warfarin Dosing on Anticoagulation Control and Clinical Events in a Real-World Setting.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- Validation and comparison between two warfarin dosing clinical algorithms and warfarin fixed dosing in specialized heart center: cross-sectional study.Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background In response to the recognized difficulty in the management of patients on anticoagulation therapy, anticoagulation management services were developed in both hospital anticoagulation clinics (HACs) and an online anticoagulation clinic (OAC) by a pharmacist. Objective To compare monitoring outcomes and complications of warfarin therapy managed by pharmacists via hospital or on-line. Setting The anticoagulation clinic of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, China. Method A retrospective, observational cohort study was used to compare patients managed via hospital to those managed o-line between December 2015 and 2016. The primary outcome was the percentage of time in the therapeutic range (TTR). The secondary outcomes were the incidence rates of hemorrhagic events, thrombotic events and extreme international normalized ratio (INR) values. Results A total of 152 patients were evaluated; 70 patients managed in a HAC were compared to 82 patients managed via an OAC. There were no significant differences in the TTR (78.9 vs. 74.0%, P = 0.393) and adverse events [major bleeding events (0 vs. 1.2%, P = 1.000), minor bleeding events (10.0 vs. 9.8%, P = 0.960), thromboembolic events (0 vs. 0%, P = 1.000), warfarin-related emergency visits (2.9 vs. 3.7%, P = 1.000)], warfarin-related hospital admissions (0 vs. 1.2%, P = 1.000), and the incidence of subtherapeutic (3.0 vs. 3.8%, P = 0.148), and extreme total (8.4 vs. 5.8%, P = 0.135), between the groups managed via HAC and OAC. Patients managed in the HAC were more stable on warfarin, with a higher percentage of INR values within the target therapeutic range (80.2 vs. 71.9%, P = 0.005) and a lower incidence of supratherapeutic INR values (8.4 vs. 18.5%, P = 0.001) compared to patients managed via OAC. Conclusion The management of oral anticoagulation therapy on-line yielded similar clinical outcomes compared to that achieved by management via the hospital, although the incidence of supra-therapeutic INR values was increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29956134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.