ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2019
Quantitative Analysis of Heterogeneous [
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noise-aware system generative model (NASGM): positron emission tomography (PET) image simulation framework with observer validation studies.Medical physics · 2025Article
- FAST (fast analytical simulator of tracer)-PET: an accurate and efficient PET analytical simulation tool.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Does consensus contour improve robustness and accuracy inEJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic FDG PET imaging based on shortened protocols: a virtual clinical study.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Value of DynamicDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Diagnostic value of dynamicQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Does consensus contours improve robustness and accuracy onEJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- Short 2-[Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: general considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Review
- Imager-4D: New Software for Viewing Dynamic PET Scans and Extracting Radiomic Parameters from PET Data.Journal of digital imaging · 2019Article
- Impact of Tissue Classification in MRI-Guided Attenuation Correction on Whole-Body Patlak PET/MRI.Molecular imaging and biology · 2019Article
- Does whole-body PatlakEuropean radiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhole-body (WB) dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) enables imaging of highly quantitative physiological uptake parameters beyond the standardized uptake value (SUV). We present a novel dynamic WB anthropomorphic PET simulation framework to assess the potential of 2-deoxy-2-[ PROCEDURES: Validated heterogeneous [
resultsKi images presented higher TBR but lower CNR compared to SUV. In contrast to MASAC, AP segmentation resulted in smaller bias for MATV and DSC scores in Ki compared to SUV images. All metrics, except for ZP, were significantly different in AP segmentation between SUV and Ki images, with significant correlation observed for MATV, homogeneity, dissimilarity, and entropy. With MASAC segmentation, CIH
conclusionsA novel simulation framework was developed for the assessment of the quantitative benefits of WB Patlak PET on realistic heterogeneous tumor models. Quantitative analysis showed that WB Ki imaging may provide enhanced TBR and facilitate lesion segmentation and quantification beyond the SUV capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29956119What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.