Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29956064›Full record

ReviewPathology oncology research : POR2018

Orphan Nuclear Receptors in Colorectal Cancer.

Michael E Kelly, Helen M Mohan, Alan W Baird, Elizabeth J Ryan, Des C Winter

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael E KellyUCD Veterinary Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland. Kellym11@tcd.ie.
Helen M MohanUCD Veterinary Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Alan W BairdUCD Veterinary Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Elizabeth J RyanCentre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Des C WinterCentre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland.
St. Vincent's University Hospital · IEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with an overall increased incidence annually. Despite improvements in treatment and surveillance, almost 50% develop recurrent and/or distant disease. Unknown cellular processes are the fundamental cause for treatment failure and metastatic disease. The interplay of chronic inflammation and carcinogenesis is well established. Recent work has highlighted the role of nuclear receptors and co-regulators in the inflammation to carcinogenesis process. Orphan nuclear receptors have been shown to be involved in numerous cellular processes, including both at a transcriptional and a non-genomic level. There is a significant emphasis to identify ligands that will interact and modify these nuclear receptors, with the long-term aim of developing novel pharmaceutical therapies. The identification of orphan nuclear receptor ligands will also help increase our current understanding of their role in cellular signaling, by enabling manipulation of these receptors. This review aims to provide a brief overview of some key orphan nuclear receptors which may be involved in colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinogenesisColorectal NeoplasmsHumansOrphan Nuclear ReceptorsOrphan Nuclear ReceptorsCarcinogenesisColorectal cancerNuclear receptorsOrphan nuclear receptorsSignaling pathways

Identifiers

PMID29956064
OpenAlexW2811217496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.