Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29956011›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2018

Expression of Gastric Markers Is Associated with Malignant Potential of Nonampullary Duodenal Adenocarcinoma.

Chihiro Minatsuki, Nobutake Yamamichi, Ken-Ichi Inada, Yu Takahashi, Kouhei Sakurai, Takeshi Shimamoto, Yosuke Tsuji, Kazuya Shiogama, Shinya Kodashima, Yoshiki Sakaguchi and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Chihiro MinatsukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Nobutake YamamichiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. nyamamic-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Ken-Ichi InadaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology II, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 3-6-10, Otobashi, Nakagawa-Ku, Nagoya City, Aichi, 454-8509, Japan.
Yu TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Kouhei SakuraiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology II, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 3-6-10, Otobashi, Nakagawa-Ku, Nagoya City, Aichi, 454-8509, Japan.
Takeshi ShimamotoKameda Medical Center Makuhari, CD-2, 1-3, Nakase, Mihama-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 261-0023, Japan.
Yosuke TsujiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Kazuya ShiogamaDepartment of Pathology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Shinya KodashimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Yoshiki SakaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Keiko NiimiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Satoshi OnoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Toru NiwaWakayama Medical University Hospital, 811-1, Kimiidera, Wakayama-shi, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan.
Ken OhataNTT Medical Center Tokyo, 5-9-22 Higashi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-0022, Japan.
Nobuyuki MatsuhashiNTT Medical Center Tokyo, 5-9-22 Higashi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 141-0022, Japan.
Masao IchinoseWakayama Medical University Hospital, 811-1, Kimiidera, Wakayama-shi, Wakayama, 641-8509, Japan.
Mitsuhiro FujishiroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Yutaka TsutsumiDepartment of Pathology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Kazuhiko KoikeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Hongo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPFujita Health University · JPFujita Health University Hospital · JPNTT Medical Center · JPWakayama Medical University · JPKameda Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSporadic nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs) are uncommon, and thus their clinicopathological features have not been fully assessed.

aimsIn this study, we have analyzed a series of early sporadic NADETs, focusing on various immunohistological features.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 68 patients with endoscopically resected sporadic NADETs. Associations between immunohistological features and clinicopathological features were statistically analyzed.

resultsThe 68 patients consisted of 46 men (68%) and 22 women (32%) with a mean age of 60.7 ± 12.2 years (range 37-85 years). The 68 tumors were composed of 39 adenomas (57%) and 29 early-stage adenocarcinomas (43%). Duodenal adenocarcinomas were larger in size than adenomas and had papillary architecture in their pathological diagnosis with statistical significance. Duodenal adenocarcinomas also demonstrated a significantly higher expression of gastric markers (MUC5AC and MUC6) and a higher MIB-1 index. Duodenal adenomas were contrastively apt to express intestinal markers (MUC2, CDX1 and CDX2). Of the 68 cases analyzed, there were only 3 tumors positive for p53 staining, all of which were adenocarcinoma. When 7 submucosal invasive cancers and 21 intramucosal cancers were compared, submucosal invasion was positively associated with expression of MUC5AC. Also, submucosal invasion showed strong association with double-positivity of MUC5AC and MUC6.

conclusionsOur results indicate that immunohistochemical evaluation is useful for predicting malignant potential of NADETs, especially focusing on the expression of gastrointestinal markers.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenomaDuodenal NeoplasmsAgedBiomarkers, TumorDuodenumEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHomeodomain ProteinsHumansImmunohistochemistryJapanMaleMiddle AgedMucin-2Mucin 5ACBiomarkers, TumorCDX1 protein, humanHomeodomain ProteinsMUC2 protein, humanMUC5AC protein, humanMUC6 protein, humanMucin-2Mucin 5ACMucin-6AdenocarcinomaAdenomaGastric markerSporadic nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

Identifiers

PMID29956011
OpenAlexW2811130509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.