Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955988›Full record

ArticleOecologia2018

Arctic plant ecophysiology and water source utilization in response to altered snow: isotopic (δ

R Gus Jespersen, A Joshua Leffler, Steven F Oberbauer, Jeffrey M Welker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pronghorn (Ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Gus JespersenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA. gusjespers@gmail.com.
A Joshua LefflerDepartment of Natural Resource Management, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Steven F OberbauerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33181, USA.
Jeffrey M WelkerUArctic, Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1504141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Warming-linked woody shrub expansion in the Arctic has critical consequences for ecosystem processes and climate feedbacks. The snow-shrub interaction model has been widely implicated in observed Arctic shrub increases, yet equivocal experimental results regarding nutrient-related components of this model have highlighted the need for a consideration of the increased meltwater predicted in expanding shrub stands. We used a 22-year snow manipulation experiment to simultaneously address the unexplored role of snow meltwater in arctic plant ecophysiology and nutrient-related components of the snow-shrub hypothesis. We coupled measurements of leaf-level gas exchange and leaf tissue chemistry (%N and δ

Indexed as

SnowWaterArctic RegionsEcosystemSeasonsSoilSoilWaterAlaskaArctic precipitationEcohydrologyNitrogenPhotosynthesisTundraWater sourcesδ13Cδ18O

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.