ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2018
Update on Inclusion Body Myositis.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stromal vascular fraction in the treatment of myositis.Cell death discovery · 2023Review
- Longitudinal Changes in MRI Muscle Morphometry and Composition in People With Inclusion Body Myositis.Neurology · 2022Observational
- Protective Effects of Foam Rolling against Inflammation and Notexin Induced Muscle Damage in Rats.International journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis of sporadic inclusion body myositis: a case series.Rheumatology international · 2019Article
- Proximal myopathy: causes and associated conditions.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWhile sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) is the most common acquired muscle disease after age 50, the pathogenesis of this disease is still poorly understood. In this review, we discuss our current state of knowledge in sIBM and provide an update on our current understanding of its pathophysiology and management. RECENT
findingsLines of evidence in support of an inflammatory pathogenesis include inflammatory infiltrates in the target organ, NFκB activation, cytokine response, MHC I upregulation, and cN1A antibody. Refractoriness to immunotherapies has led to suggestion of a degenerative pathophysiology. Evidence for impaired protein homeostasis with misfolding burden is coupled with findings of endoplasmic reticulum stress, proteasome dysfunction, and mitochondrial lesion. Recent treatment trials have focused more on correcting the degenerative process or muscle growth rather than controlling the inflammation. There has been growing evidence toward degeneration as the primary process in sIBM. This is consistent with the refractory nature of this disease. Improving our understanding of this disease pathogenesis will propel efforts to find an effective therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.