Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955963›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018

Biomechanical approach for the assessment of contacts with deformable objects.

H Muggenthaler, T Hunold, M Hubig, S Schenkl, G Mall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

H MuggenthalerInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany. holger.muggenthaler@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8832-9163
T HunoldInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
M HubigInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
S SchenklInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
G MallInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic and biomechanical assessment in case of blunt force trauma can be a challenging task especially when deformable striking objects are used. Evaluations solely based on empirical knowledge can lead to misjudgments. Semi-quantitative and quantitative investigations give the forensic assessment a scientific basis comprising experimental and calculation methods. Based on a real case where a car wheel was used as a striking object, our work presents a simple test setup for contact force estimation in head contacts with deformable contact partners. Our approach combines experimental measurements using a single accelerometer and calculations applying the conservation of linear momentum and Newton's second law. Both experimental and calculation results are discussed in terms of validity, reproducibility, and plausibility. With regard to our case, we can conclude that the injury pattern without skull fractures does not confound multiple strikes with a wheel. Skull fractures and potential fatal injuries had not to be expected assuming a head-carcass contact in case of a non-supported head. The approach presented can be applied to any case where deformable or uncommon blunt objects are used.

Indexed as

Forensic PathologyWeaponsWounds, NonpenetratingBiomechanical PhenomenaBody WeightCadaverHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSkull FracturesBlunt forceContact force estimationDeformable objectExperimental biomechanics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.