ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2018
Correlated Selection on Amino Acid Deletion and Replacement in Mammalian Protein Sequences.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correlations between alignment gaps and nucleotide substitution or amino acid replacement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A low ratio of nonsynonymous and synonymous substitution rates (dN/dS) at a codon is an indicator of functional constraint caused by purifying selection. Intuitively, the functional constraint would also be expected to prevent such a codon from being deleted. However, to the best of our knowledge, the correlation between the rates of deletion and substitution has never actually been estimated. Here, we use 8595 protein-coding region sequences from nine mammalian species to examine the relationship between deletion rate and dN/dS. We find significant positive correlations at the levels of both sites and genes. We compared our data against controls consisting of simulated coding sequences evolving along identical phylogenetic trees, where deletions occur independently of substitutions. A much weaker correlation was found in the corresponding simulated sequences, probably caused by alignment errors. In the real data, the correlations cannot be explained by alignment errors. Separate investigations on nonsynonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) substitution rates indicate that the correlation is most likely due to a similarity in patterns of selection rather than in mutation rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29955898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.