Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955892›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2018

How to create state-of-the-art genetic model systems: strategies for optimal CRISPR-mediated genome editing.

Yannik Bollen, Jasmin Post, Bon-Kyoung Koo, Hugo J G Snippert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Endogenous Tagging of Ciliary Genes in Human RPE1 Cells for Live-Cell Imaging.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. UsingBiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Critical roles of macrophages in pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yannik BollenMolecular Cancer Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Jasmin PostMolecular Cancer Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Bon-Kyoung KooInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna, Austria.
Hugo J G SnippertMolecular Cancer Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model systems with defined genetic modifications are powerful tools for basic research and translational disease modelling. Fortunately, generating state-of-the-art genetic model systems is becoming more accessible to non-geneticists due to advances in genome editing technologies. As a consequence, solely relying on (transient) overexpression of (mutant) effector proteins is no longer recommended since scientific standards increasingly demand genetic modification of endogenous loci. In this review, we provide up-to-date guidelines with respect to homology-directed repair (HDR)-mediated editing of mammalian model systems, aimed at assisting researchers in designing an efficient genome editing strategy.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingModels, GeneticCRISPR-Associated Protein 9EndodeoxyribonucleasesPolymerase Chain ReactionRecombinational DNA RepairCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Endodeoxyribonucleases

Identifiers

PMID29955892
PMCPMC6061873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.