Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955866›Full record

Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2019

Reasons for Opioid Discontinuation and Unintended Consequences Following Opioid Discontinuation Within the TOPCARE Trial.

Jawad M Husain, Marc LaRochelle, Julia Keosaian, Ziming Xuan, Karen E Lasser, Jane M Liebschutz

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jawad M HusainDepartment of Psychiatry.
Marc LaRochelleSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Julia KeosaianSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ziming XuanClinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Karen E LasserSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jane M LiebschutzClinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify reasons for opioid discontinuation and post-discontinuation outcomes among patients in the Transforming Opioid Prescribing in Primary Care (TOPCARE) study.

designIn TOPCARE, an intervention to improve adherence to opioid prescribing guidelines, randomized intervention primary care providers (PCPs) received nurse care manager support, an electronic registry, academic detailing, and electronic tools, and control PCPs received electronic tools only.

settingFour Boston safety net primary care practices. SUBJECTS: Patients in both TOPCARE study arms who discontinued opioid therapy during the trial.

methodsThrough chart review, we examined the reason for discontinuation and post-discontinuation outcomes: one or more PCP visits, one or more pain-related emergency department (ED) visits, evidence of opioid use disorder (OUD), and referral for OUD treatment.

resultsOpioid discontinuations occurred in 83/586 (14.2%) intervention and 42/399 (10.5%) control patients (P = 0.09). Among patients who discontinued opioids, 81 (65%) discontinued for misuse, with no difference by group (P = 0.38). Aberrancy in monitoring (e.g., discordant urine drug test results) was the most common type of misuse prompting discontinuation (occurring in (51/83 [61%] of intervention patients vs 19/42 [45%, P = 0.08] of control patients). Intervention patients who discontinued opioids had less PCP follow-up (65% vs 88%, P < 0.01) compared with control patients. We found no differences between groups for pain-related ED visits, evidence of OUD, or OUD treatment referral following discontinuation.

conclusionsThe decreased follow-up among TOPCARE intervention patients who discontinued opioids highlights the need to understand unintended consequences of involuntary opioid discontinuations resulting from interventions to reduce opioid risk.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainDiscontinuationDiscontinuingOpioidsTaperTOPCARE

Identifiers

PMID29955866
PMCPMC6611524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.