Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29955810›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2018

Can E-Cigarettes and Pharmaceutical Aids Increase Smoking Cessation and Reduce Cigarette Consumption? Findings From a Nationally Representative Cohort of American Smokers.

Tarik Benmarhnia, John P Pierce, Eric Leas, Martha M White, David R Strong, Madison L Noble, Dennis R Trinidad

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tarik BenmarhniaCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
John P PierceCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Eric LeasStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Martha M WhiteCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
David R StrongCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Madison L NobleCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Dennis R TrinidadCancer Prevention Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
University of California, San Diego · USStanford University · US

Funding

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTION TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL007034 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GARDNER, CHRISTOPHER D · 1985 to 2020
$8.7M
The role of ENDS use in changing rates of escalation and quitting of cigarette smoking in those under age 35 years in US populationR01CA234539 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BENMARHNIA, TARIK, PIERCE, JOHN P · 2018 to 2020
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA234539NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many smokers believe that electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and pharmaceutical cessation aids can help them quit smoking or reduce cigarette consumption, but the evidence for e-cigarettes to aid quitting is limited. Examining 3,093 quit attempters in the nationally representative US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, using data from 2013-2015, we evaluated the influence of ENDS and pharmaceutical cessation aids on persistent abstinence (≥30 days) from cigarettes and reduced cigarette consumption, using propensity score matching to balance comparison groups on potential confounders and multiple imputation to handle missing data. At PATH Wave 2, 25.2% of quit attempters reported using ENDS to quit during the previous year, making it the most popular cessation aid in 2014-2015. More quit attempters were persistently cigarette abstinent than were persistently tobacco abstinent (15.5% (standard error, 0.8) vs. 9.6% (standard error, 0.6)). Using ENDS to quit cigarettes increased the probability of persistent cigarette abstinence at Wave 2 (risk difference (RD) = 6%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2, 10), but using approved pharmaceutical aids did not (for varenicline, RD = 2%, 95% CI: -6, 13; for bupropion, RD = 4%, 95% CI: -6, 17; for nicotine replacement therapy, RD = -3%, 95% CI: -8, 2). Among quit attempters who relapsed, ENDS did not reduce the average daily cigarette consumption (cigarettes per day, -0.18, 95% CI: -1.87, 1.51).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMalePropensity ScoreRacial GroupsSmoking CessationSmoking Cessation AgentsSocioeconomic FactorsTobacco Use Cessation DevicesTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesYoung AdultSmoking Cessation Agents

Identifiers

PMID29955810
PMCPMC6211241
OpenAlexW2810813096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.